Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENT.

J.T.— Paper received, o n Wednesday, shortly btfp-:e we went to press,. Paragraph,, you- complain of -is rcuh and uncouth, and somewhat, incoherent. But the right cf comment ttiat is 'claimed 'in the " one ' case is not, as a casual 'reading might suggest, denied in the other. It is not the right ; of "comment • that is objected to, but' t-he, particular nature, or form which the comment took, and on wMqh, the- writer- is ( ; in, turn, free to comment. The only objec+don we. can see in the paragraph is the ill- temper and incobierency "at 'it, and its- 'derangement' of epitaphs.' This 'is a imiatter of -taste, on which it is— with 'such, a. writer— scarcely worth our while to waste powder, and,, shot. ( 0n.,, a .sufficient question ,of fact or right it would, be, different., •

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZT19080220.2.41

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXVI, Issue 7, 20 February 1908, Page 21

Word Count
139

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENT. New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXVI, Issue 7, 20 February 1908, Page 21

ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENT. New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXVI, Issue 7, 20 February 1908, Page 21