ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENT.
J.T.— Paper received, o n Wednesday, shortly btfp-:e we went to press,. Paragraph,, you- complain of -is rcuh and uncouth, and somewhat, incoherent. But the right cf comment ttiat is 'claimed 'in the " one ' case is not, as a casual 'reading might suggest, denied in the other. It is not the right ; of "comment • that is objected to, but' t-he, particular nature, or form which the comment took, and on wMqh, the- writer- is ( ; in, turn, free to comment. The only objec+don we. can see in the paragraph is the ill- temper and incobierency "at 'it, and its- 'derangement' of epitaphs.' This 'is a imiatter of -taste, on which it is— with 'such, a. writer— scarcely worth our while to waste powder, and,, shot. ( 0n.,, a .sufficient question ,of fact or right it would, be, different., •
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZT19080220.2.41
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXVI, Issue 7, 20 February 1908, Page 21
Word Count
139ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENT. New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXVI, Issue 7, 20 February 1908, Page 21
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.