Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THURSDAY, JUNe 30, 1904. THE BISHOPS' REJOINDER

«^^k^ KSTRK'TIONS of apace pie\ent us Joiu-j; 2?'(3] m) m ' ucn more than to refer our readeis to the SJ ! jsS^Sf pages of this issue (»n which appeals Mie 1) OS^. lnill "' lble rejoinder ot .tthe Catholic 11k-i-archy to tihe recent mamfusto of the Biblex^^¥ m-schools League. But their Loidships' otSeia^* latest pronouncement on this thorny gheuie ?»^s^ needs neither note nor com,mcsnt It lurnishes its own gloss, and is a model of lucid

and decisive tSiinking and of plain and temjparate speeti h The two weighty documents thus far ist>ued by Wie Uiwhops ha\e, we \cafure U) say, ser\ed tjien liHtcnded p l uirpose to an extent beyond their Londsflnps' tally hopes. In tihe first place, our Pielates slucceiided 111 unmasking the callous partisan principles that actuate the Bible-in-schools League, whose exposition and attempted justification of its position mudt be icgai'ded as a serious blow to tlie \ery cause winch it was intended t< serve. In the sec and place, the Bishops— Uhaiiks to tbe fair-minded Irfpint of tihe seculai press— ha\e plaxul un)der t^he eye of the great body of the elect'ois ot \(\v Zealand two documents— logical, statesmanlike, and ccmiplote— which (as the 'X Z Times ' says) ou^ht to exert a powerful influence in sih aping public opinion Ajrld, fijnally, tdiey ha*vc alighted upon the happy discovery t|hat, m the struggle agaitis-t the sect-at laansing o! I^lie pu'bhc schools, thcic stand side by ,side witti us a graat boriy of thoughtful men of e\ciy creed, an<d pi.ittically the "whole of t s he secular pi ess— so fai a.s it ha-. a voice in this mattoi— tiouet'hcr with Uie \ ast muss of piFblic opinion w<hith t moulds or lppiew^nts Bishops deserve the wannest thanks of the tommiinit \,' the ' Lyttelton Time, ' '1 he honoiis ol tihe uiiitrdveisy,' '•ays the ' OLago Daily 'lime.s, 1 'mi l.v as ll Ti^s gone, between tihe Roman Catholic BisJiops and the Bible in-sch'ools Conference, oil the education question, rest decidedly with the Bishops ' These opuuotns ate typical ot others that ha\e ouinc to hand Their Lotds}hip.s ha\e done wtia.t is acknowledged to be, boldi m its siibstajiee and in its niaainor, a \aluable setMie to tincountry, and the national, rather tliaii Ulie dcaibminational, standpoint winch tules then uttniantes i.ui'iot fail to commend itself to tair-mitided people ol e\ei\ class and creed II mow lemains lor the iletgv and Ihe laity to continue, e.t'ch 111 its jnoper w a\ , I lie goi,jd woik wihitih t.heir Loidships ha\e begun in the struggle tio m. 111 1 nl am ru 4 hl sof i 111 isi wn>call dI o defeal t \\c al l c 111 pi < 1,0 uiJ'i'l ii|ioii \r\\ Z'«ala(itl a |).i 1t v ul.u I \ odioti:. [ntm of ' St j to-endow ed st'tt aiuiiiMn '

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZT19040630.2.36

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXII, Issue 26, 30 June 1904, Page 17

Word Count
468

THURSDAY, JUNe 30, 1904. THE BISHOPS' REJOINDER New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXII, Issue 26, 30 June 1904, Page 17

THURSDAY, JUNe 30, 1904. THE BISHOPS' REJOINDER New Zealand Tablet, Volume XXXII, Issue 26, 30 June 1904, Page 17