Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Fig. 5.-(a) Moth (after P. L. Robertson) and (b) butterfly larva (after Wilson) compared in regard to size, shape and general appearance.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/periodicals/NZJAG19411115.2.8.5

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume 63, Issue 5, 15 November 1941, Page 373

Word Count
22

Fig. 5.-(a) Moth (after P. L. Robertson) and (b) butterfly larva (after Wilson) compared in regard to size, shape and general appearance. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume 63, Issue 5, 15 November 1941, Page 373

Fig. 5.-(a) Moth (after P. L. Robertson) and (b) butterfly larva (after Wilson) compared in regard to size, shape and general appearance. New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume 63, Issue 5, 15 November 1941, Page 373