Page 383 Advertisement 1

New Zealand Journal of Agriculture, Volume 63, Issue 5, 15 November 1941, Page 383

dr ;4| We-. &.*• S' -» »x i,|f> i< 'c / -T‘M* !Z JJ , "” ” ♦* - - v ' y>A7,'<ds \ -’ J&gj 5 ' < H — ? —rz \ “ J£\ 4 ?-- JIZXSW r<;<A' ■■ ® XJfe\ /XXXIr m -'JLy ' J X / jy w*X . /•> ’ s'W W J / x '/ *O 'v^ # w '& £&i&./ /^-e^~-- v> ' / / &,<* \y v / You Can’t Reasonably Con- !S7fXA W tissue Using the Knife to Your / jffi * grown rams) ISA Disadvantage! - /9! £4/10/- 'vk ' J tBBr/ Small size WX • Striking results are quoted in the Scottish Journal s'■ #/ (lambs) of Agriculture of an experiment with the two ZSSv f"I /I C / methods of castrating lambs—the knife and the K'S// ‘’y l%j/ - bloodless castrator. rZf;.: Postage paid. Ten pairs of twin half-bred male lambs were taken fff/m aaw er* wns on —. »_ from a flock of Cheviot ewes. One twin was [Sff/ fl g s;<> & jt' BJ’S k¥« XjSJk castrated with the castrator, the other with the Kg J '•“*’ *«* ™ ■B ■ ™ Vflk knife. The live weight gain between castration HWtfe. «-w?» .iwss.u aSsw him simhh —VOk and weaning was recorded for each lamb, and the gjf®i MW l|!»rWk ES II VawLdF wk gain made by one lamb Castrated with the castrator sS Sffi S® EgS feS OS aS® H 9 II Wil \'A compared with that of its brother castrated with J>®l tUcef £? TOa wJIW M IM the knife. ' - IWSSSwBIM W IN EVERY CASE, THE BLOODLESSLY »»» S 43 BSSIESa WLWs-s# VSaX CASTRATED LAMB MADE MORE RAPID Zz'l 77 /f 71 /[A GAINS, THE AVERAGE INCREASE BEING ( y/Z f svZTf/A 59 lb., AS AGAINST AN AVERAGE OF 53 lb. '"V \zf FOR THOSE CUT WITH THE KNIFE, AN / ADVANTAGE OF 61b. PER HEAD. wpa ™ ™ SSffi nms ~m Seven single lambs castrated with the 1 castrator ! A ia-y fl. '•’l 1 Ha JhBCW averaged 64 lb. increase between castration and Jrnla ™ sBU& weaning, compared with an average of 58 lb. for per head. In addition to yielding a be f ai b ; 0N YOUR LAMBS AND calves lamb, the bloodless castrator gave a bigger lamb WEIGHT CTF&kIFkiCnM r- itk .SS" ■”■•' " n b "”' 'a ß r T aham P s w?ll,am S “lt» LTD - All Branches.