Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAWN TENNIS.

SUBURBAN ASSOCIATION. CHAMPIONSHIP COMPETITIONS. RESULTS OF SECOND ROUND. The second round of matches in the Hamilton Suburban Lawn Tennis Association’s championship competitions was played on local courts on Saturday. Play in some of the matches was interrupted Tor a time by rain, but all fixtures wer° completed. Details or the scoring are as follows: A GRADE MATCHEB. DAIRY SUCCESSFUL. BIG MARGIN OVER EAST. With the score of 20 sets to 4, Dairy defeated Hamilton East, on the Dairy courts. Details of 'the scoring are as follows, Dairy players being mentioned first; — Men’s Doubles. —Syms and Morrow v. Priscott and Boyd, 7—6; Woolford and Birss v. Nichols and Nicol, 7—l; Elmsly and Shorter v. Hall and Sanders, 7—l. Ladies’ Doubles. —Misses Woolford and Kilham v. Miss Braggins ancl Mrs Bake!-, 6—i; Misses Clough and Street v. Mrs Cradwick and Miss Perry, 6—4; Misses Fow and Clegg v. Mrs Hall and Miss Court, 6—l. Combined Doubles. —Syms and Miss Kilham v. Priscott and Mrs Cradwick, 6—7: Woolford and Miss Woolford v. Boyd and Miss Braggins, 7—l; Birss and Miss Clough v. Nicol and Miss Baker, 7—2; Shorter and Miss Street v. Nichols and Miss Perry, 7—2; Elmsly and Miss Clegg v. Sanders and Miss Court, 7—o; Morrow and Miss Fow v. Hall and Mrs Hall, 7—2. Aten’s Singles.—Syrnes v. Priscott, 7—3; Woolford v. Boyd, 7—o; Birss v. Nichols, 7—5; Shorter v. Nicol, 5—7; Elmsly v. Hall, 7—o; Morrow v. Sanders, 7 —l. Ladies’ Singles.—Miss Woolford v. Miss Braggins, 0 —0; Miss Kilham v. Mrs Chadwick, 2—6 Miss Ciough v. Mrs Baker, 2 < —6; Miss Fow v. Miss Perry, o—s; Miss 1 Stout v. Miss Court, 6—o; Miss Clegg v. Mrs Hall, o—o. ST. MARY’S AND ST. PETER’S. WIN FOR FORMER. The meeting of the St. Mary’s and St. Peter’s No. 2, on the St. Alary’s courts, resulted in a win for St. Mary’s by 13 sets to 11 and 122 games to 99. Results were as follows, St. Alary’s players being mentioned ilrst: — Men’s Doubles.—Langdon an'd Brodrlck v. Galloway and McFarlane, 7—6; Lewis and Gillespie v. Walker and Alurchie, 7— 1 0; Donnelly and Murphy v. Johnston and Hall, 7—l. Ladies’ Doubles.—Misses Saunders and Butler v. Alesdames Wragge and Fow, 3 6; Airs Smith and Aliss Prendergast v. Miss Webster and Mrs Short, 2—6; Allsses Rawlinson and Jordan v. Mrs Rosie and Miss Coker, 4 —6. Combined Doubles. —Langdon and Miss Saunders v. Walker and Mrs Ford, 7—2; Lewis and Aliss Butler v. McFarlane and Airs Wragge, 2—7; Gillespie and Aliss Jordan v. Galloway ancl Miss Webster, 7—2; Brodrlck and Miss Rawlinson v. Alurchie and Mrs Rosie, 7—5; Donnelly and Mrs Smith v. Johnston ancl Aliss Coker, 7—3; Aiurphy and Miss Prendergast v. Hall and Airs Short, 4 —3.

Men’s Singles.—J. Langdon v. Galloway, 7—2; R. Brodrlck v. walker, I—7: R. Lewis v. McFarlane, 2 —7; C. Gillespie v. Murchie, 7—o; M. Donnelly v. Johnston, 7 —3; F. Murphy v. Hall, 7— 2. Ladies’ Singles.—Miss Saunders v. Mrs Wragge, 3—6; Miss Butler v. Mrs Ford, 6—i; Mrs Smith v. Miss Webster, 3—6; Miss Rawlinson v. Mrs Rosie, 6—2; Miss Prcndergast v. Miss G. Coker, -i—0; Miss Jordan v. Mrs Short, 5—6. BT. PETER’S TOO STRONG. PRESBYTERIAN DEFEATED. Played on the Presbyterian courts, the meeting of Hamilton East Presbyterian and St. Peter’s No. 1 resulted in a win for St. Peter’s by 19 sets to 4 and 143 games to 09. Details or the scoring are as follows, Presbyterian players being first mentioned:— Men’s Doubles. —St. George and Bruce v. M. Cullagli and Alexander, 2—7; Gumming and Gardner v. Hunter and Miller, 4—7; Parsons and Moore v. Lock and I. Hunter, ■i—7.

Ladles’ Doubles.—Misses St. George and Fletcher v. Miss Aitken and Mrs Stewart, 6—l: Miss Kent and Mrs Parsons v. Mrs Pollard anti Miss Wilkie, 2—o; Misses p Jarrett and D. Griffiths v. Miss Pearson and Mrs Craig, 2—6.

Combined Doubles.—Bruce and Miss St. George v. Alexander and Miss Aitken, 7 6; St. George and Miss Kent v. M. Cullagh anad Mrs Stewart, I —7; Gardner and Miss Fletcher v. Hunter and Mrs Pollard, 5—7Gumming and Miss Jarrett v. Lock and Mrs Pearson. 2—7; Moore and Miss Griffiths v. F. Hunter and Mrs Craig, 2—7. Men’s Singles.—St. George v. Hunter, 7 —C>: Bruce v. Alexander, 2—7; Gumming v. Miller, ■!—7; Parsons v. McCullagh, o—7; Gardner v. Lock, 2—7; Moore v. j. Hunter, 3—7.

Ladies’ Singles.—Miss St. George v. Miss Aitken, I—6; Miss Fletcher v. Mrs Stewart, 1 —0; .Miss Kent v. Mrs Pollard I —C: Mrs Parsons v. Miss Wilkie, 6—!;’ Miss P. Jarrett v. Mrs Pearson, 2—6: mKs D. Griffiths v. Mrs Craig, 3—o.

B GRADE GAMES. WIN FOR ST. ANDREW'S. RAILWAY GO DOWN, Railway and St. Andrew's met on the Railway conns, St. Andrew’s winning by 10 sets to S and 1.17 games to 00. The scoring was as follows. Railway players being first mentioned:— Men’s Doubles.—R. Hoosen and S. Penny v. Paterson and Hamilton, i—7; N. Wilson and L. McDon'agli v. Fear and Louden, r, • —7: G. norland and L. Wright v. Williams and Howlctt, -I—7. Ladies’ Doubles.—Mesdames Box and Weir v. Misses ,1. Findlay and C. Buckley, 0—0; Misses llackett and ,Toronto v. Misses J. Sellar and A. Taylor, a—G; Miss Green and Mrs McGregor v. Misses ,7. ciiirc and D. Robson', 2—7. Combined Doubles.—Mrs Box and R. Hoosen v. Miss G. Buckley and Paterson. o—7:0 —7: Mrs Weir and S. Penny v. Miss j. sellar and Hamilton, 7 —a; Miss llackett and N. Wilson v. Miss A. Taylor and K. Louden, -I—7: Miss Jerome and I. MeDoiragh v. Miss D. Cllffe and H. Williams, 7—a; Miss Green and G. Borland v. Miss N. Robson and C. Rowlett, 7—r> • Mrs McGregor and 1., Wright v. j. FJndiav and it 1-car, 7—o.

Ven's Singles.—R. Hoosen v. R Paierson, 2—7: s. Penny v. A. Hamilton, 7 6N. Wilson v. it. Fear. 7-—r. : [.. McDonagli '• ,v . Louden, I —7; g. Borland v. it. WII--IKm is, 7—o: L. Wright v. c. Howlctt 6 7 Ladles’ Singles.—Mrs Box v. Miss J Findlay, o—r,; .Mrs Weir v. Miss C Buck-" ly, o—it Miss llackett v. Miss J.’ sellar :t—6: Miss .lorome v. Miss A. Tavlor a - C: Miss M. Green v. Miss D. Cllffe. c,—o- - McGregor v. Miss N. Robson, -i—c '

AN EASY WIN. ST. PAUL’S DEFEAT EAST. With the score of lit sets to I, si. Paul’s experienced little dilllculty in’ sc- < u ring the decision over Hamilton East, on the East courts. Details arc as follows, East players being mentioned llust. Men’s Doubles.— liewett and Edkitis v. A. Walker and McKoskrie, V 7: Sanders and Hensiiall v. Cooke and Hall, :t —7. Ladies’ Doubles.— Miss Uraggius and Mrs liewett v. Misses K. Tintjcns and If. Tictjcns, I— 6; Misses Bcrtelsen and

Stewart v Misses J. Gowanlork and B. iolnison o’— r.; Mrs ffeliany and Miss in-oliicrs v. Misses J. Garter ami M, Hall, Men’s Singles.—liewett v. Cooke, I—7; Edkins v. A. Walker, I —7; Sanders v. McKoskrie, 2—7; llenshall v. Hall, i —7; Hay v. e. Walker. I—7; Bassett v. Tisch. o—7 I allies' Singles.—Miss liraggins v. Mis-; K TiciJens. I—6; Mrs Ilexvett v. Miss 11. Tietieiis. a—6; Mrs Itellany v. Miss Gowanlork, 2—6: Miss Berlelseu V. Miss Johnson', I—6; Miss .Stewart v. Miss Cartor. 3—6; Miss Brothers v. Miss llali, o—6.0 —6. C GRADE IYIATCHES. Sl'. ANDREW’S PREVAIL. The si. Andrew’s-st. Paul’s match, played mi Si. Paul’s courts, resulted in a win for St. Andrew’s by I 1 sets m and «ir» games lo SS. < Wilis .ti" a- follow s. si. Andrew's playcs bung mentioned lII'.- i: Men's Doubles.. D. Cr.ibn and \. ter v. Medwin and Crabb. <’>— f: It. I rcjoar and G. Gowanlork v. .McMahon and Caidcrwood, a 7. Ladies’ Doubles. —Misses 11. Clotbier

and V. Grant v. Misses ltoyes and Waters, 1;—3 ; Misses e. Carter and K. Goxvanlock v. Misses Munro and Baker. 7—3. Combined Doubles.-—D. crabb and H. Cloiliier v. I. Medwin and ltoyes, 7 —o; It. Treloar and V. Grant v. Crabb and Waters, 7—i; A. Carter and E\ Carter v. .McMahon and Munro, 6—7; C. Goxvanlock and E. Gowanlock v. Calderxvuod and Baker, 7—O. Men’s Singles.—P. Cralih v. lan Medwin. 7 —1; R. Treloar v. D. Crabb, 7 —2; A. Carter v. !,. McMahon, 6 —7; C. Oowanloek v. P. Caidcrwood. 2—-7. ladies’ Singles.— Miss 11. Cloiliier v. Mrs M. ltoyes, 6 —i: Miss E. Carter v. Mgs it. waters, 6—3: Miss A'. Grant v. Mi>s .1. Munro. ;—Miss E. Gowanlock v. Miss o. Baker, 6 U. POWER BOARD WIN. MATCH WITH IHLLCHEST. flic meeting of liillerest and Power Board, oil the liillerest courts, re.-ulled ill a win for Power Board by I:t .~eis to :t and 32 games to -i5. Results wen 1 as follows. liillerest players being mentioned tlrst:—■>

.Men's Doubles.—Roach and McPherson v. Fell and Green, f.—7; Russell and •Midi's v. Gillies and Tnniuan, u—7. 1 -Julies’ Doubles.— Misses into and .Mountain v. Miss Johnson and Mrs Jones, (>—l; Misses Baker and Drake v. .Miss Fisber and Miss I'eake, S Combined Doubles.—Hoaeii and Miss Otto v. Fell ami Miss Johnson, i ,MrPborsnn and .Miss .Mountain v. Green and Mrs Jones, o —; itusseii and Miss Barker v. Gillies and Miss I'Mirr, n—r,; Miers and Miss Peake v. Tooinan and Miss Darker, (i—ti. Men's Singles.-- Boat'll v. Fell, I—7; McPherson v. Green, -J —7 ; Bussell v. Gillies, o—7; Miers v. Tooinan, I—7. I .allies' Singles.—-Miss <>ttn x. Miss Jobnson. 0--2: Miss .Mountain v. Mrs Jones a—rt; miss \. Barker v. miss Fisber, <j—r ; .Miss Peake v. Mi-s Parker,

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WT19351220.2.94

Bibliographic details

Waikato Times, Volume 118, Issue 18764, 20 December 1935, Page 10

Word Count
1,592

LAWN TENNIS. Waikato Times, Volume 118, Issue 18764, 20 December 1935, Page 10

LAWN TENNIS. Waikato Times, Volume 118, Issue 18764, 20 December 1935, Page 10