OILY WATERS.

Waikato Times, Volume 108, Issue 18164, 31 October 1930, Page 10

OILY WATERS.

EFFECT ON FISHERIES. MENACE TO PLANTS AND ANIMALS. (From "American Forests.”) Oil leaks from a thousand and one sources have become a conservation prehlem of no mean dimension The needless waste of oil, it is readily apparent, is a factor in shortening the life of our oil resources: hut tha! is not Ihe phase of the problem which legislation now' pendinc in Congress seeks to ameliorate. This legislation, introduced by Representative Grant M. Hudson,, of Michigan, and known as Bill H.R. 10625, is aimed to prevent the destruction of plant and animal life resulting from uncontrolled oil leaks and wastage. One needs only to visualise the hundreds of thousands of places, at which oil is used to-day to appreciate the magnitude of the Problem of Oil Wastage and its menace to plant and animal life if not properly controlled. Wasted oil from any or all of these diversified sources finds its way to the ground or into sewers and is washed into streams or lakes. Much of it finally reaches the sea. Oil does not mix with water hut, is carried by wafer; and, as almost everyone knows, oil is incompatible to animals, birds and plants. Dr. G. W. Field, an eminent biologist who has made a life study of pollution, says in respect of oil waste in our streams:

“The oil forms a film over the water, spreading to rivers, bayous, marsh lands and the sea coast. It has been proved that an oil film onemillionth of an inch thick is sufficient to ruin the waters for fisheries. This film affects the fisheries in two ways'; by destroying the fish eggs or the young fish, and by destroying the food upon which fish feed. “Most fish deposit ‘pelagic’ eggs which, at a certain time in their life cycle, rise to the surface of the water. Here they come in contact with the Oil and are destroyed. This oil film, too, becomes weighted with dust and minute debris, until it finally sinks through the water, carrying down with it all the microscopic plants and animalcules upon which fish feed, destroying them. This weighted oil film finally comes to rest on the bottom,

Destroying Oysters and Shrimps and killing the food plants which grow on the bottom.” These ill-effects Dr. Field says, may sound fantastic, but they have been proved beyond any, doubt. Hunters tell of shores strewn with dead ducks which have starved in the midst of plenty. Examination of the birds’ feathers revealed a coating of oil heavy enough to keep the birds from flying. With surrounding aquatic and pfant life killed, the imprisoned birds succumbed to starvation. Representative Hudson’s Bill is designed to control this situation by making it unlawful for any person to discharge or permit the escape of oil into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. Itr would further empower the Secretary of Agriculture to prescribe regulations permitting the discharge of oil from vessels only in such quantities and under such conditions as will not be

Deleterious to Health or Sea Food,

to the migratory wild fowl or to the food supply of wild birds protected by treaty acts. While the effect of oil waste on forest growth is doubtless of minor importance, its effect in other fields of conservation, particularly fish and wild life conservation has become critical in many regions, and the early passage of the Hudson Bill should be encouraged.

(Thin oil coatings of large extent are frequently present in Auckland and Wellington harbours.)