The Drefyus Case.
FURTHER DISCLOSURES. Paris, April 13. M. Freystaetts, who was a member of the court-martial that convicted Captain Dreyfus, has declared that Dreyfus was ostensibly punished for the bordereau, but really for the selling of fortress plans. He did not know who made the accusation. STILL FURTHER REVELATIONS. Paris, April 14. The Paris newspaper L'Eclair has published the depositions of M. Trarieux, ex-Minister of Justice, before the Court of Cassation. M. Trarieux stated that Count Tornielli, Italian Ambassador to France, had declared that Italy had no relations with Dreyfus. Farther, he deposed that Dreyfus was the victim of a mistake, and that another officer communicated to Col. Schwarzkoppen the bordereau and other documents.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WOODEX18990417.2.22
Bibliographic details
Woodville Examiner, Volume XVII, Issue 2946, 17 April 1899, Page 4
Word Count
115The Drefyus Case. Woodville Examiner, Volume XVII, Issue 2946, 17 April 1899, Page 4
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.