THE CASE AGAINST TRUTH.

West Coast Times, 20 June 1912, Page 3

THE CASE AGAINST TRUTH.

SEQUEL TO CLERICAL VETO,

[PEE PBXSB ASSOCIATION.—COPYBIQHT

MELBOURNE, Juno 19. Counsel for Archbishop Wright in concluding his address claimed that defendant deliberately, falsely, and maliciously put on record s statement that plaintiff, in exercising tho veto with regard to Canon Nash, did so without honestly investigating the charges and acted with a preconceived determination to deprive it. Nash of bis position. The Archbishop in a long statement in the box, reviewing the whole facts, showing that he made exhaustive inquiries into the allegations aganist Mr. Nash, whom he consulted and advised, and Mr. Nash agreeing to the suggestion to submit his case to the Cathedral Chapter.