Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COULD NOT NAME THEIR FISH

Recd. 11 p.m. Sydney, March 6. Three brothers who conduct a fish shop and a restaurant in Pitt Street could not pick the name of a fish they were selling in two guesses, according to an inspector who prosecuted them under the Pure Foods Act. It was labelled bream. The brothers told the inspector it was kingfish. Actually, it was shark. The prosecution was a sequel to the action of two soldiers who protested and called an inspector when served with a fish they did not as bream. The brotners were each fined £lO and costs.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19470307.2.45

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, 7 March 1947, Page 5

Word Count
101

COULD NOT NAME THEIR FISH Wanganui Chronicle, 7 March 1947, Page 5

COULD NOT NAME THEIR FISH Wanganui Chronicle, 7 March 1947, Page 5