Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LATE LOADING OF THE MONTEREY

WATERSIDERS’ REFUSAL

REPORT RECEIVED BY MR. PRICE [ Per Press Association. | WELLINGTON, July 30. Facts elicited by the Waterfront Control Commission in its investigation into the refusal of the Auckland waterside workers to continue loading the Monterey after six p.m. on Saturday, which resulted in cargo beihg left behind when the ship sailed for Suva, were stated to-day by the chairman of the commission, Mr. Price, on receipt of a report from Captain Stanich. waterfront controller at Auckland. Mr. Price said the men were engaged to start work at 11 a.m. on the arrival of the Monterey, which had been delayed in the Tasman. The union's representative and the two wharf superintendents were advised by the company that loading would be completed by 5 p.m. and there would be no need for extended hours to be worked. During the afternoon a request was made for the men to work until 6 p.m. to finish loading and they agreed to do so. At 4.30 p.m. the timekeeper approached the gangs in the big hatches and asked them to knock off at 5 p.m. and return at 6 p.m. This the men refus'd to do. It appeared to him from the report that if the company had given an order in the forenoon for even one or two of the five gangs to work after 6 p.m. there would have been no difficulty, Mr. Price stated. Further, had the waterfront controller or either of the wharf superintendents been advised that there was a doubt about the men not working late, appropriate arrangements could have been made, but for some reason neither Mr. Stanich nor the wharf superintendents were consulted. The company had been insistent that the men would finish about 5 or 6 p.m. and they had not anticipated -.ny necessity for working extended hours. Ttje reason why notice of intention to work the cargo after 6 p.m. on Saturday was required during the forenoon was to enable the men to advise their homes during lunch hours that they would not be home for tea. It also enabled men who had made prior arrangements for Saturdav night to notify the bureau so that they could be replaced. In the case ot the Monterey the men had no knowledge when they started work ; in the morning that they would be. required to work extended hours: in fact they were told that they would . not be called upon to work such hours. ~! Mr. Price added that the report did not indicate the full circumstances ot the loading and a further report had been asked for. The rate of loading in two of the hatches appeared to have been slow, but there might have been special reasons. In the other hatches the men had done exceptionally good work, according to the stevedore. In one ease overloading of, slings had carried the gear away, with a consequent delay of half an hour. The cargo left on the wharf consisted of 200 sacks of hides and 30 sacks of meat casings.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19400731.2.71

Bibliographic details

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 84, Issue 178, 31 July 1940, Page 6

Word Count
508

LATE LOADING OF THE MONTEREY Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 84, Issue 178, 31 July 1940, Page 6

LATE LOADING OF THE MONTEREY Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 84, Issue 178, 31 July 1940, Page 6