RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSY
Sir, —1 have noticed with very great pleasure the space you give to the reporting and discussing of the ‘‘bigger things'’ in life. Aly own conviction, over many years of experience, is that two or three hours’ discussion by men who really understand what they are writing about will do more for the sake of truth than hundreds of personal statements, and therefore 1 can not agree with Canon Williams. He speaks. He reports. Ho should therefore be prepared to defend. Too often and very much so to-day, the pulpit is the coward’s castle. Not that Canon Williams desires that to be so by any means. To keep in with the good work, Air. Editor, there arc still quite a few folk who prefer to lead in the higher matters than in facing divorce courts, etc., etc. Thanking you, I am, yours, H.G.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WC19330801.2.23.2
Bibliographic details
Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 76, Issue 179, 1 August 1933, Page 4
Word Count
145RELIGIOUS CONTROVERSY Wanganui Chronicle, Volume 76, Issue 179, 1 August 1933, Page 4
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Wanganui Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.