THE REVIVAL PREACHE

Wanganui Chronicle, Volume XXI, Issue 3367, 15 February 1879, Page 2

THE REVIVAL PREACHE

(Ouuedin Morning H<'rald,| Our contemporary, the Daily has kicked over tlietiMceß ona We, in common with other citia hoped that with the advent v! Ijditor and iniprovement.wouid In effected in the tone of that pap wish was father to the thought ; appointment haa been the result, the old regime, when the Rev Dt ville visited Dunedin, the Dailj treated him tv «n amount of ab misrepresentation which will pre Dector forgetting his qtay here si live tv be as old as Moses. With portation of the late editor, it waa that our contemporary would o ways; bnt such was not to be. K did Mr Varley come to Dunbd immediately our contemporary, j imitation of itself under its h trenchant director, began to ana the Evangelist's heels. The r coarse p iraghrapha having failed duce the desired', sensation, and effort was undertaken to frighten lorer and to ridicule Mr Varlej must be remembered, is an gentleman, visiting the colony al cost, and asking for nothing bi heariug from those who choose ti his meetings. The writer of th, wore the skin of his predecessor i bnt when he essayed to give utte his sentiments — but why should tinne, onr readers know the coi of the fable. Silent contempt I only reception accorded to out porary's maunderinga,; a bigly i " report " of an interview beti Varley and a junior ; member of (Whom we muat presume was p intruded into a semi-private gat order to fall foul of Mr Varlej serted in yesterday's Daily Timei ing to which Mr Varley acted in vagant manner, and said some cxl ary things ; but was cleverly de by the young reporter — at least contemporary affirms ; and, for fi should be any weakness in the t demolition, it was backed up by i artiole in which Mr Varley bullied for trying to convert its t and then invited to correct its i sentations— '• in moderate langua its own columns. We regret i contemporary has returned to ways. We protest, in the i'titi New Zealand journalism, agains men who have given proof of at li good intentions by tbeir disii conduct, being treated... in the coi to say malicious— spirit that Di ville and Mr Varley have been Daily Times. We sincerely b latter gentleman wiil treat thu articled, and paragraphs with tempt they received from Dr S<> It can do hiui'iio harm, but mv to leave them severely alone.