Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Curious Action.

A novel cause of complaint came before a Sydney Court last week. A dray proprh tor named Haydon claimed £2OO damages liom another man for having erected en effigy of the plaintiff. The effigy was composed uf an old suit of clothes stuffed with straw, furuiountod with a dummy head wearing a felt ii.-.t- ibis description would lit one mar as will as another, but Mr Haydon took it to lepresi-nt himself because four curia were fastened to bis bat. The Court held this was not sufficient proof of indentity, probably because, ae a malter of fact, the plaintiff was not in the habit of wearing " four curls fastened to his hat.’ - If Mr Haydon bad only succeeded there would have been an end iA Wimpi'in fettiny \n AJetWpa 1 even a man’s heirs would have had good I twvxtw ov wcXvm W\w tdommvXXvft vr\\o \ proposed to commemorate the departed one's > wood. deeds, by vtusin?, w sAwlne va his Wnwwvc, ( if only there was as much diversity of opinion about the likeness as in the case of the Moorfiouse statue.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIST18851007.2.23

Bibliographic details

Wairarapa Standard, Volume XVIII, Issue 1743, 7 October 1885, Page 3

Word Count
183

A Curious Action. Wairarapa Standard, Volume XVIII, Issue 1743, 7 October 1885, Page 3

A Curious Action. Wairarapa Standard, Volume XVIII, Issue 1743, 7 October 1885, Page 3