THE RUBBISH QUESTION.

Waipawa Mail, Volume XXXVII, Issue 7918, 14 August 1917, Page 2

THE RUBBISH QUESTION.

(To the Editor). Sir, —The statements of the hi the rubbish question call fa criticism. He says fourteen thirty-nine persons who sipi petition are getting the same as before the change. lie ei refers to business premises,! yet to meet the resident who! rubbish removed from his residence during the last twoi hut know quite a number whoi awaiting a visit from the rubln The Mayor says some peopl to run the town. Evidently sents the attempt of the 0i i whole to run the town, ori words usurp his position. B Mayor and Cr. Holt speak if a current. It is not an unden but a very decided feeling of it the action of the Mayor u of the councillors on this | The Mayor’s claim to repr* hundred burgesses is open toqi hut the Council just elected I posed to represent the people, Mayor has his way by the ral usyal proceeding of using bisn casting vote, to defeat the I knowing that the absent cm would have supported the I It seems that the Mayor mfll his way irrespective of the wii people as expressed by a majo l he Council. I think he will W if not by the Council, by tbe microbe, who will soon taken the matter. It is not necei petitioners to say they are ii i>ay for services, but it is the the Council to see that rubbii moved frequently, and in < manner, and if necessary l charge.—l am, etc., .

L A. BO Waipawa, August 14th, 18