Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAWN TENNIS

SATURDAY'S MATCHES. ■yrx * ' . : \ j DELIGHTFUL WEATHER. Once again the weather conditions 'On Saturday were almost perfect for •outdoor pastimes, and devotees of tennis enjoyed their games to the full. •The sub-association competitions were advanced another stage, the various fixtures being determined, with several interesting contests. It would now seem certain that .Monavale will win the B grade competition, having gone through so far without a loss X—the only club with such a record this season. .SUB-ASSOCIATION COMPETITIONS. ————— t RESULTS AT A GLANCE. 1 A GRADE. Cambridge No. 2 beat Cambridge No. 1 Hautapu beat Fencourt. B GRADE. f ' St. Paul’s beat Monavale No. 2. Trinity beat Hautapu. Monavale beat Fencourt. "V .... A GRADE MATCHES. CAMBRIDGE No. 1 V. CAMBRIDGE No. 2. . The meeting between the two Cambridge Club teams created considerable intefest. A keen contest was anticipated, and this eventuated, though No. 2 team won with a bigger margin than, anticipated. Nearly every set was keenly fought out, as the scores indicate. No. 2 team won by 16 sets (137 games) to 7 sets (109' games). Following are the details of the play, Men’s Singles: D. Clow v. Wilson, 7 — 5; Armstrong v. L. Hawoifli) 7—4; Baker v. Giles, 7—4; J. Haworth v. .Jenkin, .7 —5; Williams v. McCatliic, 7 — 5; Montgomery v. Ward, 7 — 6. Ladies’ Singles: Miss Armstrong v. Miss Short, 6—5; Miss Cowley v. Miss Priestley, 6—l; Miss McCarrol v. Miss Skeet, 5—6; Miss Haworth v. Mrs "Ward, 6—3; Mrs Clow v. Mrs Freeman, :3 — 6; Miss Beer v. Miss Neely, 6 — 3. Men’s Doubles. —Clow and Baker v. Wilson and Haw'orth, 7 —5; Armstrong And J. Haworth v. Giles and Jenkin, 7 —Montgomery and Williams v. Mcand Ward, I—7. |jt,adies’ Doubles: MisSes Armstrong HW'wH&JvoUh v y Misses -Short . and Tpiestley, 6 —5; Misses Cowley and Beer v.-Miss .Skeet and Mrs Ward, 5—6; Mrs Clow and Miss 1 McCarrol v. Miss Neely and M;rs Ffeeman, 6—2. Combined Doubles: Armstrong and Miss Armstrong v. Wilson and Miss Short, 7 —4; Clow and Miss Cowley v. L. Haworth and Miss Priestley,£6 —7; J.-Haworth and Miss Haworth v. Giles and Miss Skeet, 7—2; Baker and Mrs Clow v. Jenkin and Mrs Ward, 4 7; Williams and Miss McCarrol • v. McCathie and Mrs Freeman, 7—4; Montgomery and Miss Beer v. Ward .and Miss Neely, not played. — — : A GRADE. HAUTAPU Y. FENCOURT. The meeting ,of these teams on Saturday resulted in an excellent match. result was in doubt right up to the finish, when Hautapu were declined -winners by 13 sets (124 games) to 11 sets (128 games). Had- Fencourt won cne more set, they would have won on games. j> . ' . Following are the details of play, Hautapu players mentioned first: — Men’s Singles: H. Tyer v. F. Jamieson, 7—4; W. Graham v. R. Feisst, — 6; H. Hooker v. A. Jamieson, 7—4; Bk. Roberts v. W. Cubis, 7 —5; C. Hooker v. A. Jamieson, 5—7; K. Hooker v. A. Swayne, 5—7. Ladies’ Singles: Miss K. Bourke v. Mrs Swayne, I—6; Miss M. Bourke v. Miss Feisst, 6—2; Miss V. Appleby v. Mias Jamieson, 6 —5; Mrs Russell v. ; Miss M- Jamieson, 4—6; Mrs Petersen v. Mrs Cubis, o—6;0 — 6; Miss E. Bourke v. Miss E. Feisst, 5 — 6. Men : Tyer and Graham v. Feisst and Jamieson, 7—6; H. Hooker and Iv. Hooker v. F, and A. Jamieson, ' 7 5; H. Roberts and C.- W. Hooker v. A. Swayne and W. Cubis, 7- —4. - Combined Doubles: H. Tyer and Miss M. Bourke v. R. Feissf and Mrs Swayne 7 — 5 ; W. Graham, aftd Miss K. Bourke v. F. Jamieson and Miss S. Jamieson, 7 H. Roberts and. Mrs Russell v. Alf., Jamieson and Miss M. Jamieson, 7—3; C. W. Hooker and Mrs Petersen v. W. Cubis and Mrs- Cubis, 3—7; K. Hooker and Miss E. Bourke v. A. SAvayne and Miss E. Feisst, 7- L -*3; H. Hooker and Miss V. Appleby v. And. Jamieson and Miss J. Feisst, 4—7. Ladies’ Doubles: Misses K. and M. v. Mrs Swayne and Miss Feisst Misses V. Appleby and E. Bourke ,4. Misses 8. and M. Jamieson, 2— 6; X Mrs Russell -and Mrs Petersen- v. -Mrs feCubis and Miss Feisst, 2—6. %■¥

B GRADE. * • TRINITY V. HAUTAPU. Trinity defeated Hautapu at Trinity courts by 15 sets (116 games) to 9 sets (94 games), after a very pleasant and interesting game. Following are the scores, Trinity players mentioned first: Men’s Singles: H. Simpson v. 0. Hooker, 6—4; S. Nicholson v. T. Appleby, 6 —4; G. Hay v. E. Cubis, 6 —o; Ron Hay v. B. Cubis, 6—3; J. Hay v. T. A. Russell, .I— 6; Rob Hay v. W. Graham, senr., 6 —4. Ladies’ Singles: Miss M. Burns v. Miss B. Cubis, 2—6; Miss V. White v. Miss A. Miller, 5—6; Mrs Linslcy v. Miss T. Laurent, 6—2; Miss T. Hardy v. Miss Transon, 6 —l; Miss L. Stubbing v. Miss Iv. Sullivan, 6 —.1; Miss E. Burns v. Mrs Hooker, 6 —o. Combined Doubles: 11. Simpson and Miss M. Burns v. T. Appleby and Miss A. Miller, 4 — 6; S. Nicholson and Miss V. White v. E. Cubis and Miss B. Cubis 6—3; G. 'Hay and Mrs Linslcy v. O. Hooker and Miss T. Laurent, 6 —3; Ron Hay and Miss L. Hardy v. T. A. Russell and Mrs Hooker, 5—6; J. Hay and Miss L. Stubbing v. B. Cubis and Miss Iv. Sullivan, 6—5; Rob Hay and Miss E. Burns v. W. Graham and Miss Transen, 2 — 6. Men’s Doubles: T. Simpson and S. Nicholson v. 0. Hooker and T. Appleby 3 —(;• G. Hay and Ron Hay v. E. Cubis and B. Cubis, 2—6; J. Hay and Rob Hay v. T. A. Russell and W. Graham,

senr., 6 —4. Ladies’ Doubles: Misses M. Burns and V. White v. Misses B. Cubis and A. Miller, 2—6; Mrs Linsley and Miss T. Hardy v. Misses T. Laurent and Transen, 6 —4; Misses L. Stubbing and E. Burns v. Miss Iv. Sullivan and Mrs Hooker, 6 —2.

ST. PAUL’S V. MONAVALE No. 2. This match, played on St. Paul’s courts, was rather one-sided, St. Paul’s winning every set, while most of the set were Avon very easily. Monavale players in this team are young, and several are inexperienced in match play, but their participation will stand in good stead in the future. Following are the results, St. Paul’s players mentioned first: — Men’s Singles: R. Easter v. D. ClemoAV, 6 —o; A. Symonds v. J. Watson, (;— 5; j. Parker v. A. Fishev, 6 —4; J. Keeley v. C. MeLarnon, 6—o; N. Carter v. R. Giles, 6—l; Les Bycroft v. R. Smith, 6 —o. ...... Ladies *<■ Singles: Miss Wood \v Miss Iv. Giles, 6—o; Miss Easter v. Mrs Hannah, 6—2; Miss Morgan v. Miss B. Stead, 6—l; Mrs Davison v. Miss B. Brown, 6 —4; Miss Arnold v. Miss J. Fisher, 6 —o; Miss N. Easter v. Miss E. i .Stead, 6 —o, Combined Doubles: R. Easter and Miss Wood v. ClemoAV and Miss Giles, —0; Symonds and Miss Easter v. Watson and Mrs Hannah, 6—3; Parker and Miss Morgan v. Fisher and Miss Stead, 6— 4; J. Keeley and Mrs Davison v. MeLarnon and Miss Brown, 6—3; Carter and Miss Arnold v. Giles and Miss Fisher, 6—o; L. Bycroft and Miss N. Easter v. Smith and Miss R. Stead, 6—o. Men’s Doubles: Easter and Symonds v. Clcmow and Watson, 6 —3; Parker and Keeley v. Fisher and MeLarnon, (5 — 1; Cinder and Bycroft v. Giles and Smith, 6 —l. Ladies’ Doubles: Misses Wood and Easter v. Miss Giles and Mrs Hannah, C— 3; Miss Morgan and Mrs Davison v. Misses Stead and BroAvn, 6—l; Misses Arnold and N. Eastei' v. Misses Fisher and 1 Stead, 6 —l. Totals: St. Paul’s, 24 sets (144 games); Monavale, 0 sets (37 games).

MONAVALE No. 1 V. FENCOURT.

The above teams met on the Fencourt courts on Saturday, when Monavale maintained their unbeaten record, securing a win by fifteen sets (118 games) to nine sets (95 games). Monavale ladies Avcre the deciding factor, showing superiority in all departments. Following aro the full scores, Mona.vale players mentioned first: — Ladies’ Singles: Miss D. Giles v. Miss Qualtrough, 4—6; Miss L. McLarr.on v. Mrs Simpson, 6 —2; Miss , B. Frost v. Miss Barker, 6 —2; Miss K. Fisher v. Miss Bone, 6 —l; Miss F. Gibbons v. Miss ShaAV, 6 —l; Miss M'. Giles v. Miss O’Keeffe, 6 —2. Men’s Singles: F. Smith v. T. Jamieson, 3— 6; K. Hannah v. G. Harbutt, 36; B. Smith v. A. Wiseman, 6 —2; B. Gibbons v. J. Wattam, 6 —3; N. Wrightson v. C. Feisst, 5 — 6; L. Fisher v. F. Voyle, I—6.1 — 6. Ladies’ Doubles: Misses D. Giles and L. MeLarnon v. Miss Qualtrougb and Mrs Simpson, 6 —4; Misses B. Frost find K. Fisher v. Misses Barker and Bone, 4 g; Misses F. Gibbons and M. Giles v. Misses ShaAV and O’Keeffe, 6 —l. • Men’s Doubles': F. Smith and Iv. Hannah v. T. Jamieson and G. Harbutt, C — s; B. Smith and B. Gibbons v. A. Wiseman and J. Wattam;'. 6—3; N. Wrightson and L. Fisher v. C. Feisst and F. Voyle, I—6. .• : \ i '

Combined Doubles: K. Hannah and Miss D. Giles v. Jamieson and Miss Qualtrough, 6 —2; F. Smith and Miss L. MeLarnon v. Harbutt and Mrs Simpson, 2— 6; L. Fisher and Miss M. Giles v. Wattam and Miss Bone, 6 —5; B. Smith and Miss B. Frost v. Feisst and Miss Shaw, 6—3; N. Wrightson and Miss Fisher v. Voyle and Miss O’Keeffe, 5 — 6; B. Gibbons and Miss Gibbons v. Wiseman and Miss Barker, 6 —5. KAIPAKI V. OHAUPO. The Kaipalci A team were defeated by the Ohaupo A team on the home courts on. Saturday last, as follows: Combined Doubles: Miss Cunningham and E. Boucher v. Miss Matuschka. and CoAvlcy, 2 — 6; Miss D. Turmvald and V. Mclloav v. Miss CoAvley and Smillie, 4.— 6; Miss Graham and Cunningham \ r . Miss E. Bell and Matuschka, I—6;1 — 6; Mrs Tarr and T. Boucher v. Miss B. Bell and R. Mutuschka, 2 — 6; Miss G. TurnAA r ald and F. Boyd v. Miss Fletcher and Matuschka, senr., 2— 6; Mrs McKinnon and Farrell v. Miss Warner and Bell, 4—6. Ladies’ Doubles. —Misses I. Cunningham and D. TuniAvald v. Mass Matuschka and Cowley, 6 —4; Miss Graham, and Mrs Tarr \\ Misses E. and B. 8011, 26; Miss G. Turmvald and Mrs McKinnon v. Misses Warner and Fletcher, o—6. Men’s Doubles. —R. Boucher and Cunningham v. Cowley and Smillie, 3 7; Boyd and Mclloav v. Matuschka and Bell, 3 —7; Farrell and T. Boucher v. Matuschka and Matuschka, I—7.1 —7. Ladies’ Singles: Miss I. Cunningham A'. Miss Matuschka, 3 — 6; Miss D. TurnAvald v. Miss Cowley, 4 — 6; Miss O. Graham v. Miss B. Bell, 4— 6; Mrs Tarr v. Miss E. Bell, I—6; Miss G. Turmvald v. Miss Fletcher, 2—6; Mrs McKinnon v. Miss' Warner, 2 — 6. Men’s Singles: R. Boucher v. Coaa tlcy, 3 —7; Mellow v. Smillie, 5 —7; Cunningham a-. Matuschka, 3—7; T. Boucher v. Bell, 2 —7; F. Boyd v. Matuschka, senr., 2 —7; Farrell v. R. Matuschka, o—7f0 —7f WAIKATO BANNER. WAIKATO EAST V. MORRINSVILLE. Waikato East met Morrinsvilie at Matamata on Saturday, Avlien the home team won by fourteen sets to seven, three sets being unfinished. Waikato East ladies won all their singles, AA'hilc Morrinsvilie men won all three doubles. TE AWAMUTU V. OTOROHANGA. In a friendly match at To Awamutu on Saturday, Otorohanga Avon by thirteen sets to eleven, after a very close contest. HAMILTON TECHNICAL SCHOOL. THE CHAMPIONSHIPS. The senior singles championship of the Hamilton Technical School lias been Avon by A. Dempster, and the junior singles by F. Yeoman.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/WAIKIN19301209.2.23

Bibliographic details

Waikato Independent, Volume XXX, Issue 2425, 9 December 1930, Page 5

Word Count
1,955

LAWN TENNIS Waikato Independent, Volume XXX, Issue 2425, 9 December 1930, Page 5

LAWN TENNIS Waikato Independent, Volume XXX, Issue 2425, 9 December 1930, Page 5