ONE WORD MORE.
( To tU Editor.) Sib,— l am glad to find that afte* a week's cogitation " Lethe " is again " to the front," but extremely sorry to hear his confession re the " awful thickness " of his head ; for had he appended such a confession to his critique this controversy had not begun, and consequently your readers would not have had inflicted upon them "untold agony," and poor '' Letbe" would have been a perfect stranger to that "'unreßt and almost pain" which he so much speaks of. Begarding the definition of blank verse your readers, I presume, will be ready to accept Mr Bracken's dictum, which appeared in your last issue ; by it you will see that he and I are at one in the matter. The fulsome praise at last accorded me by " Lethe " is indicative of the temperament of the writer. " Aut Cccsar aut nullus," wnich, being translated, very neirly means "a' sugar or a' saut." The axiom " Extremes meet " has been fully exemplified in " Lethe's " letters. " Lethe " speaks of " Gone " being the product of my brain or somebody else's (pure diction). Aiter so unmercifully thrashing the wee bantling, he evidently wants me to| get out of the difficulty by owning that I am not its real but only its putative father j or it may be, after a more intimate knowledge of my ability as evidenced by our friendly intercourse in your journal,he will even concede that I am a poet of superior worth to the author of " G-one." But, my dear " Lethe " (you see I speak lovingly !) this must not be ! Throughout the period of its ill-usage I have stuck to the malformed infant, and shall continue to salve and lotion it till it reaches the stage of convalescence ! Surely you will give me credit for my devotion ! Here is a quotation from "Lethe's" last production, of which I would have taken no notice only I know the burning desire in "Lethe's" bosom to hear others speak correct English will be sufficient excuse for my drawing his attention to his own incorrect English. " Between you and /, Mr Editor," &c. Now, Mr Editor, do not throw the blame on the P. D. — unfortunate wretch — as the difference between "I " (as it is) and "me" (as it should be) is as " wide as the poles asunder." This is but another example of " Lethe's" — I will not call it blundering — ignorance; all the more intolerable as he sets himself up as a critic of the works of others. I hope all are, now satisfied, and I hold out the hand of friendship to my opponent, and give to you my thanks for your courtesy. In conclusion, I wish to whisper into your ear (it is well to | gain the ear of an editor) the lessons I have learnt from "Lethe": — (1) Know a little about a matter before you condemn it (as witness the diving, searching, drawing, unrest, pain, and agony of "Lethe"); (2) though it is not' absolutely necessary that a critic should have kisaed the blarney-stone, still he should remember the higher as well as the lower function* pertaining to the office. — I am, &c,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TT18860130.2.15.1
Bibliographic details
Tuapeka Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1218, 30 January 1886, Page 3
Word Count
527ONE WORD MORE. Tuapeka Times, Volume XVIII, Issue 1218, 30 January 1886, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.