MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Star (Christchurch), Issue 17180, 25 October 1923, Page 7

MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

CHRISTCHURCH. (Before Mr H. Y. Widdo w son, S.M.) DRU NKE NNE-SS. Three first offenders and one statutory first offender were each fined 10s, in default twenty-four hours’ imprisonment. UNDEFENDED CASES. Judgment was given for the plaintiff by default in the following cases: E. Robinson y. Robert Forbes, £1 7s fid ; H. Pannell and Co. v. George Redpath, £8; J. W. Strachan v. Charles Driscoll, £5 ss; F. D. Kesteven r. E. H. Davis, £3O; Provincial and Suburban Christmas Annuals v. W. Roberts. £10: W. H. Simms and Sons, ."Ltd. v. Ernest C. Harrison, £1 ; same v. Hunter and Sons, £lO 14s 6d ; same v. F. A. M’Namara. £2 8s; same v. Maxwell Bros., £7 17s 6d; same v. W. Paton, £22 6s lOd ; same v. H. Stewart, £6 10s; same v. F. Donnelly, £9 14s 6d; W. H. Campbell v. F. Prestidge. 19s 2d; E. H. Tate v. F. IV. Wilkin. £73 3s. 6d; Bruce and Ducking v. G. Ging. £2 16s 5d : Booth Macdonald and Co., Ltd. v. T. Norris, £25 2s 6d ; same v. C. Herbert, £5 14s Gd; The Yorkshire Insurance Co., Ltd., v. Mrs W. Hardie, £2 18s 8d; Maling and Co.. Ltd., v. Cole Bros., £23 10s 8d ; John Burns and Co., Ltd. v. the Marlborough Fruit Packing and Preserving Co., Ltd., £l2 os Gd ; Mason St rut hers and Co., Ltd. v. Albert Henry Frost, £ 1 10b 9d; same v. John Gordon, £4 Is 2d; Andrews, Baty and Co., Ltd. r. W. J. R-ushton, £6: Pyne, Gould, Guiness, Ltd. v. D. M’Jarrow £47 7s 9d ; Carrick, Wedderspoon Ltd. v. O. P. Butterfield, £3l Is 7d ; John R. Proctor v. G. Gilbert, £1 2s Gd; Bell Cycle and Motor Co. v. R. H. Crutch len, £l3: Henry Mangels v. John .Miller, £6l 12s. JUDGEMENT SUMMONS Harry Hill was ordered to pay < . Collins the sum of £l3 12s lid forthwith, in default fourteen days’ imprisonment, the warrant to bo suspended provided lie pays 5s a week. No orders were made in the following cases Christchurch- City Council v. O. R. Butterfield ; W. J. M’Kenzie v. W.* To!chard; Zealandic Printing Coy v. Meikl© and Co.; Harry Ellwood v. William Meikle, and W. H. Campbell v. Richard Blackburn.