OUR LETTER BOX
Otahuhu.— Thanks, but it is of no use to vs. Anti-Twaddle. — Your letter belies the signature. Tickled — Laughable enough, but quite a chestnut. V. J. N. — It never struck us that way, and doesn't even yet. Rrsiic (Cambridge). — Too much querulous, ness, too little fact. Scandik. — All records on the subject must be in the local office. Your best course is to apply theie. Jilted.— You have a grievance right enough, but to give it publicity would only expose you to ridicule. Cniß (Cambridge).— So long as the three a^es were played constcutixely, whether they came from one hand or from bo h, two points would be scored for ihe second and six for the third. T. M — Would be out of place in the columns of a newspaper Your proper remedy is to report the matter to Inspector Cullen If you make good your complaint, his assistance is to be depended upon. Ex Member.— Have made the inquiries suggested, but with no result of any conaesequence Why not take the bull by the horns yourself? At any rate, we have not sufficient facts to go upon. D. B — You are not the first person who has put himself in a false position by signing a document without thoroughly studying its contents. It would pake a smart lawyer to help you out of the difficulty now. Admirer.— A self-denying ordinance of that kind is one-sided, and may be recalled at any time on sufficient provocation. Just wait till something happens to stir up the good doctor's feelings, and then you will see.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TO19070615.2.37
Bibliographic details
Observer, Volume XXVII, Issue 39, 15 June 1907, Page 24
Word Count
265OUR LETTER BOX Observer, Volume XXVII, Issue 39, 15 June 1907, Page 24
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.