TENNIS.

Timaru Herald, Volume CXXXVI, Issue 19109, 16 February 1932, Page 4

TENNIS.

SOUTH CANTERBURY ASSOCIATION. INTER-CLUB COMPETITIONS. St.. John’s v. High field. Playing in the Association’s 13 grade competition on Saturday at Maori Park, Highfleld defeated St. John’s by 102 games to 95, each team winning 8 sets. Detailed scores are appended (St. John’s names first):

TOWN AND COUNTRY ASSOCIATION. CLANDEBOYE v. SEADOWN. In the Temuka Town and Country Association B grade competition. Clandeboye beat Seadown at Clandeboye, by 16 sets (96 games) to 30 games. The detailed scores were, Clandeboye names first):—

WINCHESTER v. SEADOWN. In the Temuka Association A grade competition on Saturday, at Winchester, the home club beat Seadown by 12 sets (01 games) to 4 sets (-19 games).' The detailed scores were CWincnester names first): —

Men’s Singles. St. J H. Clark v. Robertson 4 9 Dwyer v. Ball 9 5 Mangos v. Lamb 2 9 Gonley v. Garr 4 9 Men’s Doubles. Clark and Dwyer v. Robertson and Ball Mangos and Gonley v. Lamb 9 7 and Garr 6 9 Ladies’ Singles. Mrs Storey v. Mrs Hayter Miss M. Venning v. Miss MeT 1 Farlane 7 6 Mrs Laws v. Miss Tyson .. 7 6 Miss B. Mangos v. Miss Palliser 5 7 Ladles’ Doubles. Mrs Storey and Miss M. Ven* ning v. Mrs Hayter and Miss Tyson 7 6 Mrs Laws and Miss Mangos v. Miss McFarlane and Miss Palliser 6 7 Mixed Doubles. Clark and Mrs Storey v. Robertson and Mrs Hayter . Dwyer and Miss M. Venning v. 5 7 Ball and Miss Palliser Mangos and Mrs Laws v. Lamb 7 5 and Miss McFarlane .. 3 7 Gonley and Miss Mangos v. Garr and Miss Tyson .. .. 7 2 Totals 95 102 Geraldine v. Wai-iti. Geraldine defeated Wai-iti by n sets (101 games) to 5 sets (80 games). The scores were as follows (Wal -iti names first): — Men’s Singles. W. ; } Cook v. Burdon 1 9 Byers v. Callanan ,. . • 9 4 Jones v. Glen 3 9 Kelman v. Jones 9 2 Men’s Doubles. Cook and Byers v. Burdon and Glen Jones and Kelman v. Callanan 7 9 and Jones 9 5 Ladies’ Singles. Miss Newbegin v. Miss Grant 3 7 Mrs Vesty v. Miss Symington 4 7 Miss Manson v. Miss Bennett 4 7 Mrs Brady v. Miss Kerr .. .. 5 7 Ladies’ Doubles. Miss Newbegin and Mrs Vesty v. Misses Grant and Symington 4 7 Miss Mason and Mrs Brady v. Misses Bennett and Kerr .. 5 7 Mixed Doubles. Cook and Miss Newbegin v. Burdon and Miss Grant 2 7 Byers and Mrs Vesty v. Callanan and Miss Symington Jones and Miss Manson v Glen 7 4 and Miss Bennett Kelman and Mr3 Brady v. 1 7 Jones and Miss Kerr .. 7 3 Totals 80 101

Ladies’ Singles. C. S. Miss M. H. Clayton v. Miss B. Hewson 6 2 Miss M. E. Livesey v. Miss A. Kyde 6 1 Miss N. Hickey v. Miss M. Hickey 6 0 Miss M. Liddle v. Miss D. Brosnahan 6 1 Men’s Singles. G. Symons v. G. Horweil 6 4 R. Sherriff v. F. Columb . 6 4 J. Nevill v. M. Cain 6 1 A. Grant v. J. McCully .. .. 6 0 Ladies’ Doubles. Misses Clayton and Livesey v. Misses Hewson and Hyde .. 6 2 Misses Hickey and Liddle v. Misses McCully and Brosnahan 6 1 Men’s Doubles. i Symons and Sherriff v. Horweil and Columb 6 4 Neville and Grant v. Cain and McCully 6 1 Mixed Doubles. Miss Clayton and Symons v. Miss Plewson and Horweil .. 6 2 Miss Livesey and Sherriff v. Miss Hyde and Columb 6 5 Miss .Hickey and Neville v. Miss McCully and Cain 6 1 Miss Liddle and Grant v. Miss Brosnahan and McCully 6 1 Totals 96 30

Ladies’ Singles. Miss M. M. White v. Mrs G. Hughes 6 1 Miss E. Scott v. Miss M. HewMiss M. C. Opie v. Mrs J. Southward Miss D. Philp v. Miss B. Bros6 0 nahan 6 2 Men’s Singles. G. Burborough v. L. Connolly 2 6 J. L. White v. G. Hughes 6 3 R. L. Moore v. J Southward .. 1 G L West v. J. Connolly 6 2 Ladies’ Doubles. Misses White and Opie v. Mrs Hughes and Miss Hewson .. Misses Scott and Philp v. Mrs 6 3 Southward and Miss Brosnahan ft 1 Men’s Doubles. Burborough and White v. L. Connolly and Hughes .. 2 6 Mc.ore and West v. Southward and J. Connolly 4 6 Mixed Double*. Miss White and Burborough v. Miss Hewson and L. Connolly 6 5 Miss Scott and White v. Mrs Hughes and Hughes Opie and Moore v. Mrs 6 4 Southward and Southward . Miss Philp and West v. Miss 6 1 Brosnahan and J. Connolly 6 2 Gaines 81 49 Sets 12 ' 4