COURT OF APPEAL.
THE BLACKBALL CASE,
P«r Pre«» Association.
. WELLINGTON, JuIy 30.. ■ In the Blackball judgment Cqurt said that' they could not /unfleirat&nd how-it could foe said 1 thait the Arljitratlioa Court had not jurisdiction io enforce Jtlie payment of a fine wider section 15 jusfcin the same . way .as a fine, for breach of an a Ward. What lm.d been done by itihft .Goiirtr was. wjlhm.iihe .very words of tho eeoti(?ij and the Court in making the order was acting ; its -j jurisdiction. In> tion.,the:Act 0f,1905 took away absolutely the power of the. Court, to th^^Aibitiration.Court., Mr Justice. Edward# diSseniied, from the, decision, holding . the Arbitration Court .had exceeded its jurisdiction.. .TJie. Jnotipri;.! was, distais&ff • witih costs against the Blackball Union^,,:
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19080731.2.41
Bibliographic details
Timaru Herald, Volume XIIC, Issue 13660, 31 July 1908, Page 5
Word Count
122COURT OF APPEAL. Timaru Herald, Volume XIIC, Issue 13660, 31 July 1908, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Timaru Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.