Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

CATTAiIX H)l"iil<AA'yh .'iC^VTilKli

I'fif Pi'Ekk A.*Boa«',iau.

■Ar-rtfiAX?), *clmw«w? 1.0. Willi.MTT) .iain«* So-uthgc.; r. r.;,plain of ll>e KvpDtmL *bicb *-m& :i.l"i<-j- eoll Hem in Atidiliutd barber, mx aiv..- beitij* 3<mt, *•«♦■: indicted before the Sufrrriji' ('truil tor <£Bt)*3yi)djti:r. Tbe jtiry rcitu'jifr] ;i verdict <»f tKri gtlilly. .and .•H.'r:..-.ve. ; ; v,a* diwliarffcd. Tic jaaJT roeottlJMeMHed iba! rnaKtal tf<!Httl«r* abould be more efficjr:;:ly maimed, and iJiat libc Marin? iterwrlmrtit decide 1o -wbid) barbour* ilif xiu-: J'o-vc dia.tuxil re» ■gulalkn* *Lun'd -J^y.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19060212.2.34

Bibliographic details

Timaru Herald, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 12901, 12 February 1906, Page 5

Word Count
78

SUPREME COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 12901, 12 February 1906, Page 5

SUPREME COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume LXXXIII, Issue 12901, 12 February 1906, Page 5