SUPREME COURT.
(By Telegraph.) CniiißTonußon, July 31. Tho Supreme Court wns occupied yesterday and to-day with tho civil notion Fowler and Co. t. R. Wilkin and Co. Tho plaintiffs aro tho well-known English manufacturers of agricultural machinery, and sought to recover £2158 (with interest) from the dofendants, morchants, of Christchurch. J. I. Carter, of Dunedin, had been agent for plaintiffs, and it was alleged had appointed tho defontants joint agents. In 1882 tho defendants sold machinery for which they wcro paid £2168. Plaintiffs had demanded an account and payment of this sum, but- tho defondnnts had refused to do cither. Tho plaintiffs prayed for accounts and payment of the sum named, otc. The defondants donied that thoy had known Carter to bo agont for plaintiffs, and that thoy had boon appointed joint Bgonta or accepted such appointment, or that they had hold and sold machinery for tho plaintiffs. Thoy alleged thoy had treated Carter as v principal, and iv ao-
cordance with the custom of trade here had accounted to him for tho machinery, so that, m fact, a balance was now due to them, instead of anything being due by them, on account of the sales which thoy admitted had taken place through them. The jury found a verdict for defendants on all tho issues.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD18850801.2.17
Bibliographic details
Timaru Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 3384, 1 August 1885, Page 3
Word Count
216SUPREME COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume XLII, Issue 3384, 1 August 1885, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.