Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDEN'S COURT, OHINEMURI.

■ ■•;•■-■■; Tuesday. (BcforeW.l'RASEn, Esq., Warden,) I Marrinan v. Seanlan; Scanlan v. Dillon and'others.—These were plaints laid to obtain possession of shares in ( the Now Found Out' claim, Waitokauri, on the ground of non-working. No. appearance of the parties; Cases struck out. ' Dodd v. McOloughen;'Marrinan r. Carroll and others.—These were plaintß laid to obtain possession of shares in tho Kohinoor claim,. Waitokauri, on , the ground of non-working. No appearance. of the parties.. Cases struck out. Leahy v. Bark and another; O'Neill v. Leahy and another.— These wore, plaints laid to obtain possession of shares in ; tho Dan Leahy No. 2 claim, Waitekauri, on the ground of non-working. No appearance * of the parties.—Case struck out. . Kelly v. Acton and .others.—This was a plaint laid to obtain possession of surplus ground in the Main Lead claim, .Earangahako. No appe'aranco of the parties.—Case struck out. Thorp v. Gillan; Murphy v. Mctiver. •-These were plaints laid to obtain possession of shares in'the Main: Lead claim, Karangahake, on the grounds that the defendants had not miners' rights entitling them, to hold the said shares. No appearance of .tho parties.—Case struck out. ■•.'.

• Porter v. McMillan and others.—This was a plaint laid to. obtain possession of shares in' the All Nations Amalgamated claim, Karangahakb, on the 'ground'of non-working. ■'. No appearance of .the parties,—Oaso struck out. Mopney v. Snodgrass.—This was. a plaint laid to., obtain possession of defendant's share in the Sir George Grey claim, Waitekauri, on the ground of nonworking. 1N T o appearance of the parties. —Cflso struck out. '

v. Dunoke.—Withdrawn;

: Kennedy v. Liddellfand others.—This was a plaint laid to o'btaiu possession oi

■'-' npn-working.--l\o' M d^vi^ruw"/u^-;::^'.0 parties. Case struck out. , ■ ■'.'■;■; . .-xKing v. : Dunokc—This'was a plaint"; laidto obtain possession of a share.in the ' Welcome claim, Waitekauri, on; .the ground of npn- working.—Plaintiff did. not % appeari—Frederiok ;a amined. Ho claimed expenses'- for five''j witnesses. Judgment for defendant, with --; 'co'Btß £6 15a.v.""..-.- :•>;■:'" >•: ■:.'*- : ■-■-'-■;-:\..- r .-:;-=-^'.:-*

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THA18751217.2.19

Bibliographic details

Thames Advertiser, Volume VIII, Issue 2227, 17 December 1875, Page 3

Word Count
315

WARDEN'S COURT, OHINEMURI. Thames Advertiser, Volume VIII, Issue 2227, 17 December 1875, Page 3

WARDEN'S COURT, OHINEMURI. Thames Advertiser, Volume VIII, Issue 2227, 17 December 1875, Page 3