CORRESPONDENCE.

Thames Advertiser, Volume VIII, Issue 2178, 21 October 1875, Page 3

CORRESPONDENCE.

ki;mM -poetee IN EBPLY;. ,'f-« To.the Editor'of 'tlip Thames lAnyEiiTKER.'' J :,;'Sie,—ln ypur issue.of'jthelM instil was rftther ; surprised f at aJ.etter.from.M]:,. .o.'Pi : Mitchell, iaiwhich jieiwants.-me. to, •retract!:ori td'make !good the ;imputation; cast .by-mrupon; MrfG.!o'HalioranV..'Jiimj sdrryt to hare 1 fi.^ain; 1 to • Tepeat l my l "toflpit sfcateiilfent—tliat Mr O'Halloranis, or jwas the registered! owner'. ! of; ; three; in tie .diatrictj .iwo; of tlie o' • tH}ing..pi^ den .inyliis bundle" of;s3i, If "this' is,' not: i'correct, then the; evidence taken by.the' Committee is at fault, and Mr Mitchell is 6orrect: in : i his ,of iiO.'Haljoran. ■Neither of.tlie claims are. the. Dan-Leahy,. ' nOii did *I ; in any-wayj refer to it in my. eviiieiiceV*'' If 1 Mitchell is'. not; satis* I fiei jwitji;.this''statement his 'can, without mi(cn : ! feoijble ■ Biifcif' it; is correct.••In'; th'e paint; whb ! paid ' the 7 first' for the riglits^.T again .r'epeat Tdid,' 'did not''hand 1 in the' names, Mr Mitchell's 'No. A right, which we so much about. In reference. to,Mr.O!Halloran'a interest in the Dan Leahy j hare nothing whkterer toidowith jt.T Behss as,much; right to. have an interest; there, as. Mr MitehelKor any other-man;fiiaviqg/paid,/ according to Mn Mitchell, pretty well for. it. i /What. -a' pity, tbat sMr -Mackay's 'position did not always.. keep ; him in ,the sarhe state of mind as.when offered the M, .Perhaps .this ,letter, of Mi! Mitchell's is the beginning of the ."lambing doWn'i'Hhatl hare, been promised'very oftin lately for the part I have 'taken in ! the : -Miners' : rights 'business.— •Yours, kc.',' Adasi Poms. * Ohinemuri, Gct. 16,1875.' ; ; •■