Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WARDEN'S COURT, OHINEMURI Friday.

< (Before W, Rusks, ,Hsq., JR.AT V Warden.) Bissett v. Oabb.—This was a plaint laid to of a sharo in tho Juncliou claim, on the ground of nou- ' '.working.-Mungo Bissett, tho bolder of a miner's right (produced) deposed that Thomas CarrY'sharo in tho Junction claim had not been worked, either by himself or by.any person for him for moro than three months previous to tho laying • of this'plaints The claim has not been under protection.—tfainos Horne, clerk " to ; the Mining Registrar, was examined.— Ordered that tho.share of fhornas Carr ' ■ in : the. Junction claim be forfeited,' and 1 that an order b6 given*to Mungo Bissett to : take possession. ' ' Moohe v. ' Donnkllt.—This was a plaiut laid to obtain possession of a share in the Junction claim, on the ground of, ; non-working.—"William Mooro deposed : John Donnelly's sharo in tho Junction ' claim has not been represented, cither by ■. himself or by anyono for him for about* three months previous to tho laying of this plaint.—Ordered that . John' Don-" nelly's share in tho. Junction claim bo forfeited,' and that an order bo givon to William Moore to take possession,

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THA18751012.2.18

Bibliographic details

Thames Advertiser, Volume VIII, Issue 2171, 12 October 1875, Page 3

Word Count
187

WARDEN'S COURT, OHINEMURI Friday. Thames Advertiser, Volume VIII, Issue 2171, 12 October 1875, Page 3

WARDEN'S COURT, OHINEMURI Friday. Thames Advertiser, Volume VIII, Issue 2171, 12 October 1875, Page 3