ACTION FOR ALLEGED LIBEL.
£20,000 CLAIMED AGAINST TRFTH
P«r Press Association. WELLINGTON, April 30. ! An application for a special jury in the coa» of Stringer, K.C., v. John Norton, an action for £20,000 damages for libel, was made to Mr. Justice Denniston to-day. The libel was alleged to he contained in certain statements published by defendant reflecting on plaintiff in his capacity as Crown Prosecutor. ftfr. Skerrett, K.C., appeared for plaintiff in support of the application, on the ground that as the articlo reflected on a solicitor in his professional eapaeitv, difficult questions requiring expert knowledge would arise. Mr. Dunn opposed the application ri the ground that no expert evidence or professional knowledge would be required, and, further, that a special jury in Christehiirch would not be impart i»l. His Honour said he would take time to consider his decision.
A bundrod things may oauso a liondnrbr — ono thinj? euros it ovory Hmotliat's Stoarns' Ho.idarbo fhirr. It stops the throbbing, toarinp; pain in ? fow minutes. Is a box. 9 The P.D. corset is the highest it i ark of achievement in its class. Often itjM' fcated. it is nevor equalled. Oaly tne makers of the P.D. corset, wift tneir wonderful orsjani.sation and facilities of <lißtribiltion, can furnish yrfn wiifc inich a corset at such a price. Quality is the test of cJiervpnofls. Wlf? help to put a premium on inferiorrty, when you can wear a P,D. P 3
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19090501.2.47
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Herald, Volume LV, Issue 13948, 1 May 1909, Page 3
Word Count
238ACTION FOR ALLEGED LIBEL. Taranaki Herald, Volume LV, Issue 13948, 1 May 1909, Page 3
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.