Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRICKET.

iUSTRAUA V. SUSSEX. ; United Press Associations— By Electric Tdegraphp-Copyrig-hi. London,' August li Fry knocked his score logether in - 80 minutes, and hit twelve fourers. Howell and lArmstrong 1 then got to ■ work, / and the seventh wicket was » down with only 136 on, the board. 1 The remaining batsmen put on 125, the innings closing for 261. Following on, Sussex had lost one ■ wicket when stumps were dravn. Scores :— SUSSEX.— First Innings. • Vine, c Duff " 9 Fry, c Gehrs, b Armstrong 70' KilUck, b Howell .! 20' Chapman, c Gehrs, b Howell ... ](3> A. Rdf/ c Cotter, b Armstrong ... 1, iR. Relf, b Armstrong 2 I Cox, c Trumper, b Armstrong 1 ... 27 Dwyer, b Armstrong, 1 Leach, b Howell ' ./. 31' I Seymour, not- out -- 35 Butt, b Cotter ... 37 Sundries '•>: Total 261 Bowling analysis : Cotter two for j 46, Armstrong five for 103, Howell three for 88,-McLeod none for 35^ SUSSEX.— Second Innings. Seymour, c and* b McLebd ... . v 21 Vine, not out . 1, Sundries 1 ; Total for one wicket ... 27 Received.Aiigust 3, 9.21 a.m. ' ' London^ August 2. ' The game was resumed in 'brilliant t .weather and on a fast wicket. Fry was taken at the wickets, the; second wiekefr falling at 60. ; ; Vine played a defensive game. 1 v The fourth wicket fell at 109, but without ' further /loss. Chapman and Vine have carried the total to IGB. SUSSEX.— 2nd Innings (Continued.) j Vine, not out 1 ..'. -44.' Fry z c Howell, b McLeod 24 JGllick, b Cotter 10 A. Relf, c and b Armstrong 18 Chalpman, not out • ... 23 I Sißndries -,^.. v , ,...-.. ... ... 25' l j Four wiolcets for ......... 168 7, 'Received*' August "3*," 0.'56" a.m. „_.. . . - .London, August 2. Sussex,, are all out in their seoondj uinsbigs^or; 219. The Australians thuU, won by an innings arid 76 ruas. •- SECOND INNINGS {continued).— Vine, c Gehrs, f b Noble 61 Chapman/ c McLeod, b Noble • ... 23 R. Reft To Noble ... ... ... ... «- 0 Cox, *c Cotter, b Noble 21 Leach, b Noble 3 Dwyer, c Cottei-, b Noble ... > ...' .... 21 • Butt, not out - !.. ... ... 0 j Sundries If j '• , ■■;'.,.';- • ' ' — '-^i : Total ... .:, •• 21ft". It is stated that Gehrs will settle in (jrlasgow. . . : ' ] The Australian share of. the , gate ' money of the fourth test match wasi £1290. . \ (By Umslopogaas.) j Wilh th'eir^'Hefeat in ' the Fburth T«»t . much -interest in the remainder of the tour has departed. /It seems hard to lind a reason for the repeated failures of the colonials. Bith- . erto they have beeri noted for their uphill play, but this proved them lamentably' Yeak v in ahnost department. \ Tjie 'fifth ' and lust test match in 1902 was won by Euglaud, the 3ast man being at the wickets v.hm this Australians' sconwas jjaH^ed. On that occasion tho colonials batted iirst and made 324 in the first, innings— Trumper 42,' Duff 23, Hill 11, Noble 52, Darling 3, Gregory 23, Armstrong 17, Hopkins' 40, Trumble 64- not out, Kelly 39, 1 and Saunders 0 being the scores, j England made 183, seven batsmen, making double figures. Australia made. 121 in the second venture. Eng- ( land badly, losing MacLaren, Palairet and Tyldesley for. ten runs, live for 48 being the score when Jessop joined Jackson, and when Jackson left the score was six for 157. yon l?ft the score was six for 157. Hirst then helped, Jessop to carry the score to 187, when Jessop was snapped up by Noble when r his score was 104. Rhodes joined Hirst at 248, and carried the score to 263, which gave the victory to England. The match against Sussex seems to result- iri good scoring by the colonials., In 1894 Trumper made 380 not out against Fry's County, and in . 1902 Noble .and y Armstrong made, scores of 284 and 172 not out respectively, and Noble, has followed up his previous success by scoring 267 in the present match. On Thursday the match against Worcestershire opens. In 1902 this match resulted in a win for the visitors by 174 runs. Australia made 274 in their ' first attempt/ Dull" 90. Worcestershire, made. 2o2, Gaukrodger 59, Arnold 38. Australia put up 199 in tKeir , second innings— 'Hill 50, Duff 30. Worcestershire collapsed in their last attempt, 9? being the total when the last wicket fell. The following Thursday the Middlesex County ; try conclusions with the colonials, and the game should be interesting seeing that the County eleven includes Warner, Bosawcpu'et , an 1 Beldam, who have already played against the Australia-ns, 'and the exVictoriaii, Tarrant, will play for the County against his old comrades. The following are the batting' aver* ages up to date, including the return Ui'atch' against Surrey. The Dublin and Scottish matches are omitted, the individual scores being j unavailable :—: — .

I c Significs not out. J C.nLuries for and against Australia : Noble 162, 125, 101, 127; Armstrong 112, 24S*, 303*; Hill 149, 115, 104 ; Darling 117* ij; Gregory 134; Trumper 108 ;' Hayward 129* ; Jackson 144* 113; MacLaren 140 ; Tyldesley : 100 ;1 Jbnb^ 104; Den ton 156*. • - v> "-I ■ '« '

* No. Not Highest Total AverBatsman.' .Inuiogs. Out. Score. Runs. a;,«Armstrong 29 ... 5 303° ... 1436 ... o, Nob»e ... 31 ... 1 162 ... 1372 ... 4b Bill ... 29 ... 1 149 ... 1080 ... 2C Trumpet 29 ... 1 108 ... 1014 ... it Kopkias... 23 ... 4 93.... 593 ... 3i Darling ... 33 ... 4 117<> ... 933 ... 3. Duff ... 34 ... 0' 94 ... 9C9 ... 2t Cotter ... 23 ... 2 48 ... 438 ... 19 Gregory... 24 ... 2 134 ... 495 ... 22 Gehrs ... 18 ... 1 ?2 ... 2?8 .., It MoLeod... 27 ... 5 70 ... 356 ... H Layer ... 20 ... 3 73 ... 28U ... 1 Kelly ... 20 ... 9 74* ... 19 J - J' Sbwland 9 ... 5 25 ... 52 ... laoweil ... 14 ... 3 16 ... 80 ... /

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19050803.2.50

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 12926, 3 August 1905, Page 7

Word Count
926

CRICKET. Taranaki Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 12926, 3 August 1905, Page 7

CRICKET. Taranaki Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 12926, 3 August 1905, Page 7