Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DANGER OF COLONIAL INDEPENDENT NAVIES.

London, May 21. | Sir Michael Hicks-Beach,, aii the lui-j penal Industries' Clitb dinner, declared it -would be a grave Jnistafee in ihq interests of tho Banpire if any self .-governing colony, maintained 'an indepeaii dent navy instead of joining 1 in thq cost of a great Imperial navy. 1 1 anything like proportional contributions were received fromi the colonies, the latter must be admitted to "tilie counsels of the ]Empiro 4 to decide *ho pcJicy cA the Empire. Due promotion of further unio"n should be on the lines of common defence as parts of a copinion Empire. Mr James, Westralian 'Agent-G-ew-ral, said the Imperialistic fooling in Australia "was stronger than in Great Britain. The desire to develop a separatr navy was not becauso it wa* dosired to shirk responsibilities.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19050522.2.12

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 12862, 22 May 1905, Page 2

Word Count
134

DANGER OF COLONIAL INDEPENDENT NAVIES. Taranaki Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 12862, 22 May 1905, Page 2

DANGER OF COLONIAL INDEPENDENT NAVIES. Taranaki Herald, Volume LIII, Issue 12862, 22 May 1905, Page 2