New Zealand Telegrams.
•" ' (Per, Press ' Aasoc4ti»»)^ ; .i
THEFT OF/GOODS F&Oljp". VESSELS. , ,;. - V 7-" ■ WeHingion, NoVMalter 14. 'By the San Francisco mail^he *e«« retary of thd WeUin^toii>"Chiteber of Commerce received arlettef? ir bimlw London f Chamber, of Comaiera&£rtttt« ' ing that active inveStigctibtf-'tla^fce* ing made regarding the pfifertott" of cargoes at London docks. The lloin* Chamber is anxious to receive- from merchants in New Zealand tparticu~ lard: of any robberies oi.g;oo«ta^:iftnd printed forms ax© twine aemt ontV up* on w hicti' ißforwation , of-tl» tfestrip« U«i of rtolen «©4*ss. may y bei*ttt baefc tn boudoir for the assistant* of tfce detective force ,ta«mr. £ ; .. .-■ A, poll of ratepayers yjrks tdkqa today on %c njfoposai. to anply «th« .rating unimproved system tQ eUy, properties. Ili«re.were .6100 voters on. . the vql\; 285$ ©t.wj»«>m vote^, 1201 tor t^e proposal ,&nC39I against-. The system Will c*nieTint© operatic* »exfc Afarek. . " WCYOMS: THIEF PUNISHED. Wellington, November 15, Mr Justice Edwards sentenced Leo* Natso* to Sti years' hard ■ U-s baur for- bicydo stealing. NATIONAL JNSURANCy COM- ' ■. ;>; > PANY. j^| . ,IAt til* annual meeting, 04-theiiSat, \ ioA») Insurance Company^ Mr J . tr RttfWe. the Chairman of Directors, in, moving 1 the adoption of the report reoojnmenjding a dividend of ls-8d - per ah«ro» said that at , aereral Joint*;- nottkbly- in New Zealand, the Company, had made, no, profit; jit all- . but at other . points , the • Company had done well, ■ thanks to tn^stafl and a hit of luck thrd'^n^rt. Tpfce Compiiny had* not donesofbadly in non-p,aytng districts 'as 3the>s:;> The premium"- income had incjroaaod by nearly. £6000, but ofevSy £i taken in premiums the CompanV^ha# saved for itself aboUt Board placed £10,000 to reserve because they believed they had flLslice'of luck this year,, and were not justified ia distributing. more of the profit:- TOte JfPort j»m adopted, and Messrs J» M. Ritchie and Keith Hanway-were , re-elected directors.' '- " "*'"««^ .' AN APPEAL* CASE/ Dunedin, November 18. In Banco, tho policed t(bpeale<d against the decision ■of "Mr Qrkh&m in acquitting William Hatnmoiid^Oo* veil, who had been charged in 'the Court below with a breach of the Offenßive Publications . *Act." Th« wound of , the abpeal ,w^,thii i&k
Whether itoe publication in question .Was offensive, section "5 of the Act £w£Pg 7 ;thO' Xegislaijure'S' definition. Mr ijnapmari, for. the, respondent, cpntendedJthat the wqrK: was . purely & medidai one, and' that » tne P«lic<? wer^ rigljt if would lie "an offen.ee for * otfpmiedical man. I tb.stidw .it %o aribxher^'medical^najn. The ITudge decided that the legislature was aiming .not «,t the class of books referred to*,: but tto advertisentents and otlier Blatter that character, and dismissed the appeal.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TH19011115.2.21.3
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 11818, 15 November 1901, Page 2
Word Count
422New Zealand Telegrams. Taranaki Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 11818, 15 November 1901, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.