BEEF FOR GREAT BRITAIN
ARGENTINA’S ADVANTAGES PROBLEMS FOR THE DOMINIONS. HEAVY LEEWAY TO MAKE UP. “The cable message from London in which an English expert predicts that it will be five or ten years before any of the meat-producing Dominions can seriously compete with the Argentine in the markets of Great Britain, either in the quantity or quality of chilled meat exported, is a fairly accurate conclusion,” said the principal of a leading firm of New Zealand meat exporters at Auckland on Friday. “The quality of Empire stock has not made any notable improvement in recent years and very little money has been spent on importing good breeding strains,” he said. “The Argentine, Uruguay and Brazil, however, have continuously applied themselves to developing and improving both the livestock and the conditions which would make for improvement of their beef products. The Argentine, in particular, has of late years made great strides in producing the so-called choice baby beef which commands a premium in London. “It is difficult for a New Zealander to appreciate the tremendous amount of leeway the Empire has got to make up if our beef exports are going to make any impression against the steady flow of Argentine beef products,” he continued. “The Argentine has had a wonderful start and the quantity of chilled beef of superior quality sent from that country to great Britain is in the neighbourhood of 600,000 tons a year. •We have got to build up practically from zero.”
THE EMPIRE’S PROBLEM.
Rhodesia and Australia, he said, were the two principal Empire countries possessing the best facilities for the production of beef, but neither country was at present able, nor seemed likely to be in the near future, to ship beef regularly to Great Britain all the year round. There had been experimental shipments from Australia and South Africa of chilled beef and especially of sterilised beef, none of which, however, could"’be called successful. Several shipments of live cattle were made each year from South Africa to Liverpool, but the animals were not of consistent quality. Rhodesia’s drawback was the long train journey to Capetown, which occupied at least two days, and the longer sea journey to Britain. Both Australia and South Africa depended upon seasonal rains for fattening their herds and neither country had yet done on an adequate scale the necessary fencing and dipping on which to lay a sound basis for cattle-farming and the breeding-up of their stock. Some areas of Queensland had decided possibilities, but the seasonal rainfall, tick and also the distances made it difficult to secure the necessary numbers of high-quality cattle at any one port —so essential to successful handling of a highly-perish-able product.
RESOURCES OF THE ARGENTINE.
By comparison, the Argentine possessed tens of thousands of square miles of perfectly flat plain, with a rich alluvial soil covering a porous waterbearing sub-strata, which supplied the roots of the alfalfa grass and ensured rich, luscious feed all the year round. The Argentine was not subject to droughts or -serious cattle pests and the magnificent ' inland watering of the River Plate enabled the beef to be brought quickly and cheaply to the huge freezing works and shipped from some of the most modern docks in the world |ay fast steamers making the voyage to London in 17 or 18 days. By killing some 3000 to 4000 head of cattle a day in these large plants, it was possible to fill several hatches every 24 hour’s, close them up and control the atmosphere accurately. It was impracticable, the exporter added, to collect chilled beef in small quantities at a' variety of ports, as was done in New Zealand, with . frozen beef, mutton and lambi y'
BRAZIL A GROWING FACTOR.
“Brazil has immense areas of good cattle country and is becoming a factor in the chilled beef trade with Britain,” he said. “But with Brazil, as with the meat-growing countries of the British Empire, the rainfall problem makes her business seasonal, and she is unable to meet the Argentine in serious competition as far as best-quality beef is concerned. She is a serious competitor with the Empire’s, frozen beef trade, however, because she is selling a good-eating quality of ■ chilled beef, distinctly superior to any frozen meat on the market, at prices very little above the cost of our frozen article. “As far as New Zealand beef is concerned, the position is somewhat difficult. We have country that can produce cattle good enough for best-quality chilled beef,'but it is a question whether that land would not be worth far more to the owner as dairying land. New Zealand, of course, must continue to use cattle to keep her sheep country in order, but after cattle have'been used for crushing, they are not suitable for chillers when fat, and this is a powerful economic difficulty in the way of providing choice chilled beef for the English market. As far as inferior chilled beef is concerned, New Zealand would meet strong competition from Brazil and South Africa, both of which have very cheap labour, cheap land and only half the sea carriage. There is only one other area in the • British Empire ’ that has good possibilities and that is Nigeria. Probably more will he heard of that country in the years to come.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19320803.2.119
Bibliographic details
Taranaki Daily News, 3 August 1932, Page 12
Word Count
882BEEF FOR GREAT BRITAIN Taranaki Daily News, 3 August 1932, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.