Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OVERDUE PROMISSORY NOTE

JUDGMENT GIVEN BY COURT.

By Telegraph.—Press Association.

Wellington, August 27. An action to recover £950, allegedly overdue under promissory notes, was brought in the Supreme Court before the Chief Justice against the executors of the late Anthony Harper, bootmaker, Wellington, by a firm of merchants alleging that Harper had promised to pay£looo and had not done so, except £5O. The defence was mainly that the promissory notes were given, for. an illegal consideration; i.e.,‘ an agreement not to prosecute a former secretary, a friend of Harper, who, it was alleged, had admitted various defalcations to the company. His Honour gave judgment for the full amount, with 50 guineas costs and disbursements, saying that it had been made clear to the secretary at the outset that it was never intended, to prosecute.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19300828.2.27

Bibliographic details

Taranaki Daily News, 28 August 1930, Page 6

Word Count
134

OVERDUE PROMISSORY NOTE Taranaki Daily News, 28 August 1930, Page 6

OVERDUE PROMISSORY NOTE Taranaki Daily News, 28 August 1930, Page 6