Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PETITIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS.

SUBSIDY FOR PROTECTIVE WORKS

~A, :-P?5 J? n T as recei^e<l from residents of Brook street and Seymour Avenue wh o were heavy losers by the flood, m the Brook Stream, asking the Council's assistance to afford protection from future "-floods aud further damage. They asked that a substan--SSY iT g? ¥ erected on hoth baQks: ■■where the washout occurred. Cr. Hampson said it was private property and-the Council could fothmg:, rfuch as they sympathised wit« toe petitioners, .if they assisted some of the sufferers l.y tiie flood they must assist all, and they could not make a gln ?J Present for such a purpose. -Cr. Moffatt thought the Council had some liability. The position was the same here as in districts where river bonrcs were in existence. Cr.Webley moved that the matter be referred to- the Works Committe& to inquire whether some cheap protection could be provided. At the time of the record fiood in 1870 the Board of gorKs carried out protective works. He did not -tnmk the Council was hohle^^ the,oad might be daxnaged: Mayor suggested that a grant of £10 be given out of unauthorised expenditure to, tho-petitioners to erect InySli^^ '""HP***

J • ■ . Cr. Pitt suggested" that they mi^kt make it £10 for each.side. &- in reply jp a question, the City Engineer said he had suggested a scheme to Mr. Parmenter, the, heaviest loser, which would cost about £50. It n ro l vided;for three wails of wattling, filled' With stones, and Slkd up behind Mr Farnjenter had arranged for material tor the filling, which was not included m the estimate. If the Council intended to do anything it might offer a ±, ior £, subsidy. On the motion of Cr. Hampson, s^onaed by Cr. Moffatt, it" was decided -withowt / prejudice to ofJ »}*% petitioners a subsidy oi £1 for £1 up, to £25 for an approved scheme .of river protection, the work to begone under the super! vision of the City Engineer. A petition was also received from Co t I | Tafa¥ r Street ' aski»g the Council to make more adequate provision for the escape of storm water . ihe^atter> as referred to the .Works Committee

A petition of the.same nature from SS^S**"1-*^™'"^ SS' Md2ie^S. r 10° -ra*of"- =-

It was decided, to offer Mrs Charles

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC19160729.2.28.3

Bibliographic details

Colonist, Volume LVII, Issue 14150, 29 July 1916, Page 4

Word Count
379

PETITIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS. Colonist, Volume LVII, Issue 14150, 29 July 1916, Page 4

PETITIONS FROM PROPERTY OWNERS. Colonist, Volume LVII, Issue 14150, 29 July 1916, Page 4