Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DIVISION IN VICTORIAN ASSEMBLY.

Melboubnb, January 16,

During the doba'.e on ihe Premier's statement that Sir J. B. Patterson, ex-Premier, had approved generally of the action of tbe Government, one Labor representative protested strongly a^aicst ihe action of the Government. alleging tbat the House of Representatives had been insulted by the Legislative Council, and that the back-down by the Turner Government wa_ worso than anything displayed by the late Government. Mr A. Deakin feared the Government had not realised the soriousness of the position, and said he regarded the fa _ in tbe Colony's Btocks was due t. the rejection of the Land Tax Bill. The acion of the Government, he thought, amounted a most to a sacrifice of prinoiple, and he considered the Government might have adopt.d a course which would have asserted the right of the Lower C? am ber. This, he concluded, would have been better for ths Government and the country.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC18950117.2.10.6

Bibliographic details

Colonist, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8148, 17 January 1895, Page 3

Word Count
154

DIVISION IN VICTORIAN ASSEMBLY. Colonist, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8148, 17 January 1895, Page 3

DIVISION IN VICTORIAN ASSEMBLY. Colonist, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 8148, 17 January 1895, Page 3