LABOR V. CAPITAL.
(In.Threb Chapters.) Chapter 11, To the Editor of the Colonist. Sib, — The question has unfortunately in tsnsified since the first chapter was written, and a rival dialogue 13 in print. However, as my two dia'.ogists decline to be influenced by tiit-m, Capitalist -will reply to L-ibor. Capital : You concluded JaH night with a grandiloquent peroration on the dignity of labor ; but therein was an implied threat, or at least prophecy of a bad revoiutioM ; labor's dignity would be seriously discounted if their unionism and strikes led up «to bloodshed. Pablic opinion would set in so strong against them that collapse would be inevitable. Labob: Intolerance of action begets intolerance in language. You threw, down the guantlet last night and prophesied that L-jbor would cry peccavi. Doi-s this invite conciliation, or invoke resistance. What this latter may lead to, is a problem ; if the ass had not brayed the lion might not have discovered his whereabouts, and more might have been left of him than the tail. Your contention is for money ; ours 13 for human beings, and their advancement. . You appear to place sticks and stones aa of equal ra-ue with: flesh and blood; will you understand , that in point of numbers capitalists are as 1 to labors 20, why Bhould the mihoritv rale absolutely ? Hag not the recent Representation Aot been framed ialmost wholly in: the interest of numbers?. Property qualification hwl to take a baok seat, and this ie the New Zealand law ;by which we ; are governed^ Clearly : capital must BUrrend^^^ tights ; labor is quite prepared and anxious to- meet Jt on equal term* with & view to seitle by oonf erenge wbat a revolqti(Jn cannot
settle. Why delay the inevitable ? Capital: For oentnriss the upper olass have been privileg-d to rale, and have by their prudence commanded the confidence of capitalists, so much so that Great Britain stands uaiqne as a model of all that is honorable and fair. Labor might well submit to the ruling of such men, and not commence a crusade against oapttal, without which progress is .impossible. Capital ba3 never, nor will not now, Buooumb to labor, ; but from another point of view when labor enters into an engagement with manufacturers at a price, that price enters into his calculations juat as muoh as the cost of bis machinery and raw material. Both are elements go* venting the price of the arliole produced, which beoomes a eet price ; if the labor item rises, tha manufacturers profit vanishes, or is seriously reduced. Will you say that Capital is wrong in resisting the rise in wages ? Labor: Tbifl question is best answered by asking another. Daes the manufacturer ask labor whether he shall introduce improved or automati'.-. machinery ? Some genius invents ft mau' ;i:=e that with two attendants performs the woik of 20 men, the capitalist who always has bis eye to bnsiness, buys one, and the account stands probably thus : — Then 20 men at 8s a dr.y for 800 day per annum, £2409 ; now 2 men at 8s a day for 300 day 3 per annum, £240 ; cost of machine, £1200 ; life of machine. 20 years ; annual deterioration, £60 ; interest on outlay of £1200 at 5 per cent £60, £360. Will you say that labor is wrong in asking for a rise in view of a teourrenoe. by the introduction of another similar machine? or oan you state a parallel case where capital hns given a bonus or annuity to discharged men. Here is a gain to the capitalist of £2000 per annum dear of interest. Is it not a faot, Mr Capital, that if it happened that £2000 a year had been lost, a redaction of wages would be made or tried on ; every argument advanced still further proves the necessity of a more complete understanding between us. Capital ; These arguments are beside the point; and you ; have left oat tha labor required to make the machine. Further, when a serious and costly accident occurs, who but tbe capitalist hag to bear the brunt ? Labor ! It is evident capital will not yield, and will have its pound of fleeh. Id conclusion for to-night, I will renly to your last question by asking another. Wnen a serious and costly accident occurs and 50 or 100 iiveß ere lost, ;or as many maimed, who but tbe workers and their families have to bear the brunt ? A sensational subscription is made by tbe humine outsiders, and the capitalist employer probably heads the list with £100 for 100 lives, bat the oripples require constant attendance. Let ns endeavor at our oonoluding meeting to devise some Ecbema uniting Capital with Labor on an equitable basis. Youm &c, Mobb Axox.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TC18900901.2.10.1
Bibliographic details
Colonist, Volume XXXIII, Issue 5896, 1 September 1890, Page 3
Word Count
784LABOR V. CAPITAL. Colonist, Volume XXXIII, Issue 5896, 1 September 1890, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.