Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BAGGOTT V. WAITOA ROAD BOARD. Thames, Friday.

The case, Bigijott v. \Vaitoa Koad Board, an action to recover £30 damages tor certain diainage works, was heard in the Li.Al. Court to-day. The case was jjtrnck out on legal tiiat the work having been performed under the Public Works Act, any claim for compensation must be decide I in properly constituted Compensation Court. Costs £39 16s were awarded to defendants.

Auckland, Friday Some heavy clearances of su.>ar from bond in tile to day, in anticipation of the [josbiblo increase in duty.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TAN18850613.2.4.2

Bibliographic details

Te Aroha News, Volume III, Issue 106, 13 June 1885, Page 2

Word Count
90

BAGGOTT V. WAITOA ROAD BOARD. Thames, Friday. Te Aroha News, Volume III, Issue 106, 13 June 1885, Page 2

BAGGOTT V. WAITOA ROAD BOARD. Thames, Friday. Te Aroha News, Volume III, Issue 106, 13 June 1885, Page 2