Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

THE CIVIL LIST. The following is a list of cases set flown for hearing at the civil sessions of the Supreme Court at Christchurch, ■which open on Monday next: — REMANETS. (Before a jury of 12.) Twynehaui and another (Mr Twyne)ianii'v, Eangitoto Estate Co.—£looo, amount agreed to be paid. (Before the Judge alone.) Holmes (Mr Upham) v. Cook—£34o 11/8, interest due on money lent. Theimer (Mr F. S. Wilding) v. Newnliam (Mr Donnelly)—refund of ft.':;-! and interest. .xilpatrick (Mr Twyneham) v. Pearce '(Mr F. S. Wilding)—specific performance. Louglinan (Mr Fryer) v. Scott and another (Mr Wright; —specific performance. Bond (Mr M. J. Gresson) v. Clephane {Mr F. S. Wilding)—rescission of agreement and repayment of £lOl6 1/7. Schroder (Mr M. J. Gresson) v. Schroder (Mr Johnston) —return of » £265 and chattels. Bishop (Mr Alpers) v. Ford—£:!■"> ■',/-, moneys held for use of plaintiff. NEW CASES. (Before a jury of four.) Duxbury (Mr Buchanan) v. Clarke Olr Alpers)—possession of chattels ami £25 damages or £BO, value of chattels and £25 damages. Butherford (Mr Thomas) v. N.Z. Farmers' Co-operative, Ltd. ((Mr Walton)—£4ls 4/-, loss on stock, plus • expenses. (Before a jury of 12.) Cook (Mr Upham) v. MeKenzie (Mr Alpers)—£s62 10/-, commission on sale. Day (Mr Alpers) v. Taylor (Mr White) —£501 damages, malicious publication. Gates (Mr Donnelly) v. Henley—£looo, breach of promise. Boag (Mr Upham) v. Kennedy (Mr fioggard)—£l7Bs 16/-, damages for niia.represeutation and £3l difference on account. McMillan (Mr Donnelly) v. Barker (Mr Flesher)—£looo damages and £22 12/-, special damages for negligence. Thompson (Mr Alpers) v. Andersons, Ltd. (Mr F. S. Wilding)—£§ol, breach! of agreement. j Dearing (Mr White) v. Paynter and Hamilton (Mr K. M. Gresson)—£ll22 7/-, damages for negligence. The Official Assignee (Mr Donnelly) v. Briee (Mr M. J. Gresson)—£lloS 5/2, money lent and interest. Stanton (Mr Alpers) v. Mt. Somevs Lime and Stone C 0.—£11.12 5/-, damages for negligence. (Before the Judge alone.) Burn (Mr Alpers) v. Burn—£7os or declaration re trust money lent. Lynskey (Mr M. J. Gresson) v. Tubman and another (Mr Malley)—Rescission of sale and leave to resell land. Cudsell (Mr Upham) v. Hopkins— Specific performance and £IOO damages, ' or £IOOO damages. Coombes (Mr Hanna) v. Erickson (Mr Johnston) —Specific performance or £2OO damages. Moss, Ltd. (Mr Maegregor) v. Fisher (Mr K. M. Gresson) —£.".S5 damages and costs for nondelivery. Hunt (Mr Upham) v. Curtis (Mr Buchanan) —Possession of land and mesne profits. Simpson (Mr N. W. White) v. Cox— Possession of land, £IOO for use of same, rescission of coutraet, return of chattels or £SOO damages, £IOO damages for use of chattels. MeEvedy (Mr M. J. Gresson) v. Uolley—£2oo and interest, money lent. Craddock and Co. (Mr McDougnll) t. Lawrence and Hanson Electrical Co. (Mi A. J. Luke) —Specific performance or £27 S/8 damages and costs of goods, and £216 10/-, goods sold. Read and another (Mr Wright) v. Hayton and others (Mr F. S. Wilding) Declaratory judgment. Green (Mr Upham) v. Atkinson (Mr Sargent)— of premises and • £8 11/3 rent. ,-The Official Assignee (Mr Donnelly) T. North (Mr Thomas) —Possession of chattel or £3OO, and £25 damages. Duraudu (Mr M. J. Gresson) v. Cowper (Mr Andrews) —£230 15/2, commission. Coble (Mr Thomas) v. Duncan— Specific performance and £SO damages. McClinton (Mr Dae re) v. Archibald— Decree that defendant hold lease in trust for plaintiff or £SOO damages. Curtis (Mr Buchanan) v. Hunt—£soo damages for breach of agreement. Holmes (Mr Grove) v. Cook (Mr Upham) —£ir;s2 IS/0, money lent and interest thereon. The order of business will he fixed at a sitting in Chambers on Friday. TIMAEU CRIMINAL SESSIONS. Press Association. TIMARU, August 17. I At the Supreme Court to-day, William Oswald Ilooney and Allen McLean Nudge, I who in the Magistrate's Court pleaded guilty to seven charges of breaking and entering! and theft at Timaru. came up for sentence. ! They were granted probation for three years • on the first charge, and ordered to conic up ■ for sentence on the other charges, and to

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNCH19200818.2.101

Bibliographic details

Sun (Christchurch), Volume VII, Issue 2031, 18 August 1920, Page 14

Word Count
660

SUPREME COURT. Sun (Christchurch), Volume VII, Issue 2031, 18 August 1920, Page 14

SUPREME COURT. Sun (Christchurch), Volume VII, Issue 2031, 18 August 1920, Page 14