Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNLICENSED AGENT

NO PERMIT SECURED FINE OF £l2 10 - IMPOSED Carrying on business as a land agent i without being licensed to do so re- ! suited in John Stewart Richards being fined £l2 10s at the Police Court 1 this morning. After Mr. G. Bennett had entered a plea of guilty, Chief-Detective Ham- • mond said that Richards had com- ! mitted a breach of section 31 of the | Land Agents’ Act, 1921 and 1922, for which the maximum penalty was £SO. The firm had since gone into liquida- ; tion, but had carried on lor some ; time without a licence. According to counsel it had been Richards’s intention to get a licence ; after the first deal had been pm through. Business had been very' bad and. during the time the firm was in existence, only one deal had been put through. “I will quarter the fine,” commenia4 Mr. F. K. Hunt, S M.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SUNAK19290528.2.119

Bibliographic details

Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 674, 28 May 1929, Page 9

Word Count
151

UNLICENSED AGENT Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 674, 28 May 1929, Page 9

UNLICENSED AGENT Sun (Auckland), Volume III, Issue 674, 28 May 1929, Page 9