GIPSY'S EXPLOIT
HYPNOTISM IN CRIME Medical and Legal Views DISTRACTING OF ATTENTION The story from Auckland concerning the Greek gipsy hypnotist,' and the methods he was alleged to have employed in extracting money from business people and bank tellers is feasible, according to Christchurch legal and medical authorities with whom the matter was discussed, reports, the Christchurch Star. d&Rjg Medical men said -that: hypiiptie suggestion was practised., in Certain cases with more or less'liavourable 'results. There were cases on record where a patient, had been made to do certain things, for his well-being, which at first he had refused to do. It was a case of making him take his mind off the most important matter to him for the time Wing, and then, having got him interested in .something else, to proceed to carry out, with the aid of auto-suggestion, j the line of action originally decided | upon. As far as the bank tellers were concerned, the very fact of the j gipsy entering the bank premises, i and suggesting certain things, quite I foreign to banking business, would in j itself attract a man's attention from j
! his regular and organised daily work. If the gipsy "had entered the bank during a slack period, with few people on the premises, which was more ,than likely, his time would appear to be more opportune than at another period of the day. Once having attracted the attention of the victim the power of hypnotism would be. applied to a more or less extent. 1 Although the teller would be conscious, to a degree, of his surroundings, the very fact of an unusual happening would cause him to concentrate on the gipsy, and then the remainder of the trick would be easy—sleight of hand would follow naturally. Recollection At the end of the day, when the cash was being checked up, a shortage would be found. Immediately the victim would begin to cast his mind back over the day's proceedings, and j the outstanding happening would nat- { uially be the entrance and business of .the gipsy fortune teller. The immediate association or combination of ideas would point to him as being, the only one who could have taken the money which was missing. Representatives of the legal fraternity agreed with the expressions of medical men in the main principles. More evidence, however, was required, they said, about the hypnotism part of the theft than had appeared in the newspapers before that part of the business could be absolutely decided upon. Regarding the sleightof hand suggestion, it was agreed that perhaps that phase of the operations had very much more to do with the actual theft of the money than hypnotic influence. It was stated, however, that it was not unknown in criminal law for the practise of auto-sug-gestion to be carried out. Sleight of Hand
A criminal lawyer referred to the tact that the victims in the Auckland cases admitted that they had had their attention distracted by somehing which was unusual in their everyday course of business. When that happened, then the time was ripe to apply the sleight-of-hand work. The lawyer aptly demonstrated and illustrated his point in his room with a coin and other documents and in a moment they had disappeared—he had simply attracted the attention of a pressman and others interested to other matters and objects. Both medical and legal men agreed that there was no case on' record, nor was there any evidence whatever, that through hypnotism a person could be made to commit a major crime. That was to say, if it was against the nature of a person to commit murder all the hypnotic influence in the world could not compel him to do it.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19330222.2.3
Bibliographic details
Stratford Evening Post, Volume II, Issue 177, 22 February 1933, Page 2
Word Count
622GIPSY'S EXPLOIT Stratford Evening Post, Volume II, Issue 177, 22 February 1933, Page 2
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.