Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

APPOINTMENT OF RAILWAY GENERAL MANAGER

OPPOSITION VOIGES ' STRONG CRITICISM.

%AW OF COUNTRY SET ASIDE"

PARLIAMENT ONLY A FARCE.

.Press Association—Convrifht ~ WELLINGTON; ThYs Day?'-' After the telegraph office eft?*,«s the Monse continued to aMtCßtw the first item on the Estimates* and the amendment mWtil h;r the leader of the Oppo-, sifcioii to reduce it hy £9 as a protest, against the appointment V the General Manager of Rail-

ways. ' „■;.,; The Prime Minister, in ropi,jr to criticism, said full particulars of the appointment would V\ i . desod in the Railway Statement which v/ould'be brought down shortly. •MIGHT BE ILLEGAL.* He did not remember all the detail's ' of 'th's\'appointment, but the ■j.ieneva'l manager's salary was £33.10,, arid there was to be superanuia;ion, but the salary would not be exempt from income tax. The appointment might be. illegal, but- it was not, /Unconstitutional, and could be rati%(i by Parliament. ; .., Members of the Board had re-: -signed mainly -for health reasons,; and under all the circumstances the Government had acted in the best

interests of the railways in making the change in management. Mr; P. Fraser demanded to know

■what terrible fate was hanging 1 over the railways that this change " was", necessary before Parliament could meet. [He did not question Mr Sterling's appointment, but he did object to the setting aside of a law of the country to do it. Parliament was.becoming a farce,

land, '£*U' niembeirs were .« to do was to endorse what ithe Min,,.'/ister ■ did.' ' *<' ... ' '

METiIOI) OF APPOINTMENT. Mr H. E. Holland said he was not attacking Mr Sterling, but only tho method of his appointment. Mr 'H. Atmore said he believed the people would strongly disapprove of what was a shocking disregard for constitutional "procedure. The division resulted: — For the amendment —15. Against—43. The item was not reduced., Progress was then reported, and the House rose at 2.40" till 2:30 p.Ji.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19280823.2.18

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Issue 24, 23 August 1928, Page 5

Word Count
310

APPOINTMENT OF RAILWAY GENERAL MANAGER Stratford Evening Post, Issue 24, 23 August 1928, Page 5

APPOINTMENT OF RAILWAY GENERAL MANAGER Stratford Evening Post, Issue 24, 23 August 1928, Page 5