Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Blackmailing Case.

EX-GOMVSGT & BARONESS. "OBVIOUS FORGERIES." BY EIELTKIO Telegkaph—Copy RIGHT i [United Press Association.] (Received 10.45 a.m.) London, March 4.

Hugh Dalrymple, an ex-convict, sued Baroness Von Goetz, a wealthy philanthropist and organiser of a farm for discharged prisoners.

Darlymple alleged that he loaned the Baroness money, and produced scores of the Baroness' letters contain-

ing endearments

In a sensational cross-examination, counsel proved that Dalrymple was convicted of frauds on women in 1896.

In order to explain discrepancies in the letters, Dalrymple alleged that a twin brother was responsible.

Dalrymple's counsel threw up his

brief. A verdict was returned for defendant.

The Judge impounded a hundred letters which were obvious forgeries. Evidence was given that the Baroness had £40,000 in the bank at the time of the blackmailing.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/STEP19140305.2.21

Bibliographic details

Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 54, 5 March 1914, Page 5

Word Count
128

Blackmailing Case. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 54, 5 March 1914, Page 5

Blackmailing Case. Stratford Evening Post, Volume XXXVIII, Issue 54, 5 March 1914, Page 5