CANADA’S NAVY
SIR P, EOKBEK’3 attitude. . REPRESENTATIVE VIEWS. By Telegraph.—Prcsa Association. —Copyright. OTTAWA, Jan. 13. '■During the debate on the Canadian Naval Bill, Air Alonk. member for Quebec - (Conservative), dissented from Sir F. W. Borden’s argument. The creation of a navy would mean, he said, that Canada would participate in the wars of the Empire without representation in the British Parliament. The Bill was read a first time. The "Morning Post’s” Ottawa correspondent says that Sir W. Laurier has made important concessions to tho weight of public opinion in adopting the larger of the two plans furnished by the Admiralty. Admitting that Canada would be automatically involved in any war affecting the Empire, the provision allowing the Government to place the navy at the disposal of the Admiralty was seriously marred by its permissive character, thus contemplating the possibility of Canada remaining aloof. The Post commends Sir F. W. Borden for repudiating Sir W. Lauricr’s recent utterances which suggested that.the Canadian Navy, upon the outbreak of war, would slink into harbour while Parliament was being summoned.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ST19100115.2.39
Bibliographic details
Southland Times, Issue 14322, 15 January 1910, Page 5
Word Count
176CANADA’S NAVY Southland Times, Issue 14322, 15 January 1910, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Southland Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.