Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE PARNELL COMMISSION.

(Per Electric Telegram—Copyright.)

(Per Press association.)

(Received 8 p.m., May 10th.) London, May 9,

Sir Charles Russell apologised to Sir James Hannen for his oversight in not having the documents in readiness necessary to enable the cross-examination of Mr Parnell to go on. Archbishop Walsh’s examination was continued. He gave it as his experience that the League had diminished crime in Ireland. The secret societies which had been started after Mr Parnell’s arrest were now virtually extinct in the rural districts. He said that he abominated the articles in the Irishman, and disapproved of many of those in United Ireland. He admitted that he had never denounced boycotting, but considered intimidating by force moat reprehensible. He disapproved of Mr Parnell’s advice to the people to shun men who took farms from which tenants had been evicted. He also objected to publishing a black list of persons who refused to join the League.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/SCANT18890511.2.10

Bibliographic details

South Canterbury Times, Issue 5004, 11 May 1889, Page 2

Word Count
155

THE PARNELL COMMISSION. South Canterbury Times, Issue 5004, 11 May 1889, Page 2

THE PARNELL COMMISSION. South Canterbury Times, Issue 5004, 11 May 1889, Page 2