APPEAL COURT.

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXVI, Issue 10476, 11 October 1912, Page 8

APPEAL COURT.

Per Press Association. Wellington, October 10. ’ The Solicitor-General stated reasons why the minute book should be produced. ' He submitted that its production would not be oppressed. Such a claim was only being made because the objection of solf-incrimination was taken away by statute. He further said the affidavit of discovery was not conclusive, while from its nature the Court could not see it. The claim that the documents were irrelevant was made on erroneous grounds. He finally submitted that he had shown that the minute book might be relevant. Sir John Findlay followed, and the case is proceeding.