FEILDING COURT.

Rangitikei Advocate and Manawatu Argus, Volume XXXIV, Issue 9416, 10 April 1909, Page 8

FEILDING COURT.

THURSDAY, APRIL 6th. (Before Mr A. D, Thomson, S,M.) , Id. the following undefended cases judgments were giveu*for plaintiffs : —John Cobbe v. Bert Brown, claim £3l 16s lid, costs £4 16s; J. D. Anderson v. Mrs R. Potier, claim £2 14s Bd, costs 11s; Aitken & Evans v. John Evans, claim £2 ICe,boosts 16s; A. J. Kirklands v. Thomas Loonan, claim £7 10s, costs £2 Is; W. Toose v. E. O. Moran, claim 15s 7d, costs ' 12s; Oroua Gonnty Council v. J, R. Allerby, claim £9 13s 2d, costs 25s* ; same v. Percy E. Baldwin, claim £4 13s 6d, costs 10s; Atkinson & Co. v, H, Cole, claim £1 18s lid, costs 21s; J. Gould & Son v. S. Martin, claim .14s 9d, costs 5s ; J. A. Kingsbeer v, A. Parris, claim 16a sd, costs ss; F. Amadio v. B. Woods., claim 15s Gd, costs ss; James Penny v. Frank Burgess, claim £5 ss, costs 23s 6d; Marston v. T. Simpson, olainrlOs 6d, costs 17s; Pirani & 00. v. A. J. Haywood, claim 15, costs 30a 6d; A. Apiin v. A. Hooper, claim 17s 6d, costs ss; E. H. Fisher v. W. B. Watson, claim £2 16s 6d, costs 10s, JUDGMENT SUMMONS. Marshall Lowe v. H. R. Funnell, claim £3 16s 3d, order made for payment forthwith dr suffer 48 hours imprisonment.; Q, P, Amor v. W. B. Giesou, claim £l6 19a, amount to be paid forthwith or defendant to suffer 'l4' days’ imprisonment ; Spence & Spence v. Peni Hera, claim £l, amount to be paid forthwith or in default three, days’ imprisonment; Oarl Beanmast v. J. W. Jensen, claim £3 3s, amount to be paid forthwih or in default three days’ imprisonment; Bel" 0 & Oollina v. William Marsdeu, claim £1 4s Cd, amount to be paid forthwith or in default two days’ imprisonment; A. H. Sutton & 00. v. Alex. claim 6s. amount to be paid forthwith or in .default three days’ imprisonment; Aitken & Evans v. Geo. Smith, the

debtor was examined, no order made; J. Coker v. J. P. Findlay, claim £7 10s, amount to be paid at once or default seven days’ imprisonment; W. H. Percival v, D. Cole, claim £8 165,6 d, amount to be paid_ forthwith or in default nine days’ imprisonment. .■ ■ ■ ■ DEFENDED CASES. William McKay v/H. Strachan, claim £ls. Mr Graham for the plaintiff, and Mr Trewin for the defendant.' This was a claim for compensation on second of damage done to about 1-5 of an acre of grow’ing potatoes caused by the pig of the defendant. Evidence given showed that a gap had been made in the fence and it bad not been repaired at ijtie time of the trespass by the pig in such a way as to render it a sufficient fence. And taking into consideration .the fact that the defended had offered to pay, the damage a competent valuer might assess. Judgment was given for £7, without costs for the plaintiff. A. Aplin v. Clark, claim 15s for repair of gig. Judgment was given for theplaidiff. Wilfred H. Redwood was charged with selling three bottles of stout and one of beer to Elizabeth Morphy, on January Ist, contrary to the provisions of the Licensing Act. Sergt. Bowden conducted the case for the Crown. Mrs Murphy stated she had made the purchases mentioned from the defended along with two gallons of beer. Mr Ongley for the defended, admitted the sale and contended that it was quite legal the quantity being over two gallons. The case was adjourned for the police to obtain legal assistance on the point.