Masterton District Court.
lIULL-K BKCTION. OKPKB MADE FOB St’BRENDEB OF LEASE. At tb* Mut«rtoa District Court on Fnday. Mr Itnnn; lunb utprliouioatoc tb» trml of Wm. Hull, of Fanimtna. and
' to f; 14 him in |iri«>n nntil he ■urrendere t tm lit-.n.... for cert.ui prauerty cleim-*! by the tMtrial A«l(iim. Cnnotl.rtbb took place in th*. of which the I'cp ity Aeeigneo j (Mr s..|i«r; »». cxatuinod. an 4 the whole ) of the pr.>reedin|r* taken to recover, for llie hencht .*f the eitaie. the deferred pavI luent section m dieputc. were reviewed. - Ilia Honor ttaled that in giving the ! deri-ioii he did in July lfOifl. in the civil action Hlv v llrigga relating to the land in liupntc. he was aalmtied that he wa. not i ret smog the previon. deci.ion of hi. , (*redcoe«»or Judge l>avy in connecI tetn with the application of the OtTicial | V».ig'ic- fur Hull . hrenM. Mr Itunny rea.l the deci.ion in Bly v Idrigg.. in which hi. Honor held tlial the ref leal of the (.and Board or the Ih.trict Court Judge to make Hull deliver up the licnu- in no way inlrrfrrred with the nghl. ‘ conferred by rlanae .’»4 of the Bankruptcy Act, which teal, all the preperty of a debtor in the Official Aa-ignoe. Mr Bunny .aid tile nection ipioted .hould hate been 72 in.tend of .’>4. Hi. Honour admitted that he had made [ a ini.tnk*. Mr Bunny enhinitted that thi. decision I willed the matter. Hi* Honor: It wa. never appealed | agaia.t and I think it wa. right. Mr Bunny: Obeiooaly eo. Mr Bunny said the application wm for Oeterrcd Payment License, No. 4*7, ' dated 27th May, Ism". Mr Sellar, in reply to the Court a* to ! whether he had r< a».ui to believe the , bankrupt had concealed certain pro|ierty, .aid he knew the debtor had certain pro- | perty in hi* ]><>a.e.»ion. Mr Bunny argued that a refusal to pro. doce implied concealment. Mr Sellar in reply to further question* •ai I he required the Itceime for the pnr- !■ >-e« of the Act. The land wu. included iy the debtor in hi. statement of anitets. Mr Bunny Maid the asset waa valued at | £230. Hi* Honor said the Act provided no f r:u of commitment, and Mr Bunny 1 repded that he would hvok for oue under | the Kiigli.h Act. Hu Honor granted the application, and i the writ for imprisonment under ttdrd , .notion of the Art will accordingly he , issued.—Star. BANKRUPTCY BUSINftSS. S. Ilinislow, contractor, was etsmined hv Mr Bunny, his evidence corresponding w tii th' statement made at the recent meeting of creditor* st I’nlnatua. The • tsnnnation wa. declared closed. In re Eli C.-undberg, of Pahiatua storekee|M<r. ai. order wa. made authorising a nm not exceeding 4'3 to be paid from the rstato for maintenance.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PSEA18900708.2.12
Bibliographic details
Pahiatua Star and Eketahuna Advertiser, Volume 5, Issue 410, 8 July 1890, Page 3
Word Count
462Masterton District Court. Pahiatua Star and Eketahuna Advertiser, Volume 5, Issue 410, 8 July 1890, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.