Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SECOND EDITION. IMPERIAL RELATIONS

. «• QUESTIONS IN COMMONS PRIVY COUNCIL APPEALS (Elec. Tel. Copyright—United Press Aesn.) 'Australian and N.Z Cable Association.! (Received November 26, 2 p.m.) LONDON, Nov. 25. In the House of Commons, arising out. of the Imperial Conference, Sir C. Kinloch-Cooke inquired whether Mr. Baldwin would undertake that .steps would not be falcon to impair a British Dominion subject's- right of appeal to the Privy Council without the Imperial Parliament being consulted.

Mr. Baldwin replied that ho could not give an assurance that Parliament would be consulted, except to an extent involving legislation.

Sir C. Kinloch-Cooke asked whether a change was contemplated in the right of a Dominion Governor to refuse his assent to a Bill passed by a Dominion Parliament or reserve any measure for the Crown's consideration.

Mr. Baldwin said this aspect of tiio Governor-General's position was not dealt with by the inter-Imperial relations report. He was not aware that : ny change was contemplated.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/PBH19261126.2.62

Bibliographic details

Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16201, 26 November 1926, Page 8

Word Count
157

SECOND EDITION. IMPERIAL RELATIONS Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16201, 26 November 1926, Page 8

SECOND EDITION. IMPERIAL RELATIONS Poverty Bay Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16201, 26 November 1926, Page 8