A SENSITIVE DEPARTMENT,
STUDENT CRITICISM RESENTED.
AUCKLAND, January 18. The curbing of the liberty of the Train-! ing College magazine by a “ responsible censor ” has been asked by the Depart-, ment of Education, but the Auckland Edu. cation Board has some sympathy with the students. Following an outburst about the economic position contained in a lead« ing article in the journal, the department wrote to the board saying that the article was written by a ‘‘.teacher with a griev-. ance,” and that it was intended to promote discontent among the students, “ The magazine should not be allowed to comment on the policies of the board or of the department, and it should be subject to the censorship of a responsible officer.”
“ I think every word of the article is perfectly justified,” said Mr T. U. Wells.. The Chairman (Mr A. Burns): I think members of the board have said something similar earlier in this meeting. We had better get a report from the principal on it. r
It was stated that the magazine was published at the students’ expense. Mrs Nellie Ferner: How can we appoint a censor, then ?
Ihe Manuka’s editorial, which was objected to, stated:—“Students come into college expecting that at the end of their course they will obtain a position yielding a salary of at least £165 for a town position, and up to about £l3O, including all allowances, for a sole charge school. Instead of this, the majority— say, 60 per cent.—of those leaving college will receive salaries of about £145 a year. Considered . le point of view of the students, this is a financial disaster. To expect a young man of about 20 or 21 to live on a salary of less than £3 a week and at the same time to keep up the standard of life which is expected of a teacher is ridiculous. If we had been cognisant of these facts before entering college we should have no cause for complaint’ but no warning was given, and now, after wasting at least two of the most valuable years of our lives, we find ourselves trained for a profession which can offer nothing better than this.” The board decided to ask the principal for a report. 1 1
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW19280124.2.54
Bibliographic details
Otago Witness, Issue 3854, 24 January 1928, Page 14
Word Count
375A SENSITIVE DEPARTMENT, Otago Witness, Issue 3854, 24 January 1928, Page 14
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Witness. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.