DUNEDIN S.M. COURT.

Otago Witness, Issue 2914, 19 January 1910, Page 62

DUNEDIN S.M. COURT.

Tuesday, January 11. (Before Mr H. Y. Widdowson, S.M.) Judgment was given for plaintiffs in the following undefended cases: —H. Wise and Co. v. Janies W. 11. Martin, of Auckland, £5 7s Id, on a dishonoured promissory note, with interest; costs £1 3s 6d. Ahliold Bros, and Co. v. Frederick J. Crane, of Hawcra, £l2 17s 6d, for goods; costs £1 10s 6d. Thursday, January 13. (Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.) Judgment was given for plaintiffs by default in the following cases James Waters v. H. T. Smith (Christchurch), claim £1 13s, for goods (costs ss); J. A. O’Brien v. Thomas M'Gill (Makikihi), claim £5 7s, for goods (costs £1 14s 6d); Samuel Smith and Co. v. Archibald Hunter, claim £4 15s, for goods (costs 10s); same v. John Baker, claim ISs, balance due for goods (costs ss); Wright, Stephenson, and Co. v. S. Hansen (Hawca Flat), claim £5 14s 6d, for goods (costs £1 2s 6d); the assignees in the estate of John Webster v. William Deuchrass, claim £1 12s 6d, for goods (costs ss); Smith and Co. v. A, Meiklejohn, claim £4 13s lOd, balance due for goods (costs 11s); A. E. Usherwood and Co. v. Thomas Cassidy (Bannockburn), claim £5 4s lid, for goods (costs £2 Is 6d); Archibald M‘Galium v. George F. Hanson, claim £4 Bs, balance for goods (costs 12s); Otago Farmers’ Cooperative Association v. W. May (Cromwell), claim £7 3s lid, for goods (costs £l 3s 6d); Muir and Moodie v. Wilfred L. Aitkon (Palmerston North), claim £7 4s sd, on a dishonoured promissory note with interest (costs £1 3s 6d);' Thomas Travis v. Susan Wilson, claim £1 4s 3d, for goods (costs ss); Wilson. Balk, and Co. v. David A. Sommerville (Auckland), claim £25 19s 4d, on a judgment summons against D. A. Sommerville and Co. (costs £2 14s); 11. Mansoor v. J. E. T. Fakhri. claim £l7 12s 7d, for goods (costs £1 10s 6d); John Murdoch and Co. v. Andrew M. Nelson, jun., claim 5s lid, balance for goods (costs 6s). Dawson and Co. v. Susan Wilson. — Claim, £8 12s, on a judgment summons. — Mr Irwin appeared for plaintiff, and there was no appearance of defendant. —An order was made for the payment of the amount claimed forthwith, with costs Bs, in default seven days’ imprisonment. William Crossan v. Walter Goodman. — Claim, £1 19s, on a judgment summons. — Mr Hay appeared for plaintiff, and in the absence of defendant an order was made that lie pay the claim forthwith, together with costs (6s), in default three days’ imprisonment.