WAGES ORDER
UNION APPLICATION MILITANT CAMPAIGN CHALLENGE TO COURT Industrial Correspondent WELLINGTON, Mar. 16. A challenge to the authority of the Court of Arbitration is contained in the campaign now being developed by the militant , unions behind the claims of the New Zealand- Federation of Labour for a full £1 a week increase in wages for the workers. Union branches are passing resolutions and union journals are publishing editorials demanding that the full £ 1 shall be granted. They threaten that if it is not. “further setps will be taken.” The militant unions, which have a majority within the national council of the Federation of Labour, have determined that the £1 a week is the next big issue on which they are prepared to fight all-comers—the employers, Chambers of Commerce, the Court of Arbitration, or the Government. They claim that no one can deny that the worker has lost ground to the full extent of £1 a , week, and they are prepared to go to the full length tb get that £l. ' 1 Not only do they openly declare they will do this, but they demand also that the Government must act to prevent prices from rising when wages are increased. Round this policy the same powerful industrial forces that achieved the overthrow of the Waterfront Industry Commission and the establishment of higher guarantees and better conditions for watersiders are now being marshalled. ; Just how much the unions expect to receive from the court is indicated by the secretary of the New Zealand Waterside Workers’ Union, Mr T. Hill, who, writing in the March issue of the New Zealand Transport Worker says: Mobilisation of Forces “The Arbitration Court has never been noted for its generosity towards the workers. A perusal of recent awards issued by the court shows that 5s a week, or ljd an hour is the maximum they have granted. Therefore to win the 6d an hour (£1 for 40-hour week) we must mobilise. In that way we can put .the representatives of the Federation of Labour in the position to inform the court that the 6d must be granted, or else . . This and similar references .in union journals and * in union branch resolutions indicate that the militant unions now feel themselves strong enough to tackle the Court of Arbitration. Several have already hinted that because of delays and decisions unsatisfactory to the workers they will break away from the court’s jurisdiction to achieve their demands.
Mr Hill’s article continues on this point: “The function of the court has been clearly defined. It is not so much to determine wages and conditions as to preserve industrial peace. .If it wants to do that the way is obvious. But the court’s value to the employers in the past has been demonstrated by their demand for all disputes to go to arbitration.- They love the Arbitration Court. Harry Holland, Bob Semple, and others aptly referred to it as the ‘ leg-iron for labour.’ ” - Mr Hill’s union has long since left the Court of Arbitration itself, but has arranged with the Government that it will benefit from any wage increase the court may shortly grant. His union has for. some years contained sufficient industrial power tp take much of what it has wanted. Its recent major victory is already inspiring other unions to contemplate direct action. Move Away front Court
While the waterfront dispute had hardly begun, the New Zealand Tramway Employees’ Union was taking a national poll on the issue of moving for a national agreement, or, alternatively, deregistering under the Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act and registering instead under the Trades Union Act. This move would place all disputes under the Labour Disputes Investigation , Act, • which gives: the .worker the legal right to strike.
The official journal of the New Zealand Carpenters’ Union recently echoed the cry that the court was in fact a “leg-iron for Labour”. -The president of the New Zealand Labourers’ Federation, Mr P. M. Butler, has also hinted that the time may have come for unions to seek satisfaction of their demands by some constitutional means other than the Court of Arbitration. The militant unions have, in fact, used other means. The Strikes and Lockouts Emergency v Regulations, a war-time measure, have been employed frequently over the last 12 months to force swift settlement of industrial disputes, in many of which the court has already given its ruling. This method of circumventing the court and forcing further concession has become extremely popular. Tribunals at Disadvantage Strike and lock-out tribunals, however, meet under the threat of direct action on the part of unions, and their decisions cannot fail to come within the influence of that threat. It is a threat that emerges from the union’s full appreciation of their industrial power in a time of grave labour shortage. When labour is more plentiful they will be ready again to seek the shelter of the court. As things are at present, however, the militant unions are powerful enough to move independently of the court. It is not only consciousness of their new power that moves the unions to take direct action and to talk of abandoning or challenging the court at this stage. There is at the same time a realisation that the Government of the day may not survive its present term, and that in any case it is not disposed, without pressure, to grant more concessions to the unions. The unions are, therefore, setting out to take for themselves as big a slice as they can of a “ new order ” while there is still time. ■■
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ODT19470318.2.29
Bibliographic details
Otago Daily Times, Issue 26413, 18 March 1947, Page 4
Word Count
928WAGES ORDER Otago Daily Times, Issue 26413, 18 March 1947, Page 4
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Otago Daily Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.