RESEARCH WORK

Otago Daily Times, Issue 23202, 28 May 1937, Page 10

RESEARCH WORK

PRESENT METHODS ATTACKED " NEGLIGIBLE ACHIEVEMENT " GREATER CO-ORDINATION NEEDED LACK OF EXPERT STAFF (Special to Daily Times) CHRISTCHURCH, May 27. Dissatisfaction with the present system of agricultural research in New Zealand has already prompted the North Canterbury branch of the New Zealand Farmers' Union to prepare a remit for the Dominion Conference of the union, suggesting a co-ordinated scheme. After an attack, on the present research methods by Mr Alan Leslie, formerly veterinarian at Canterbury Agricultural College, the executive of the branch decided to seek the support of other provincial executives for its proposal. Almost negligible achievement, lack of expert workers, and illdefined spheres of activity were alleged against the Government research organisation by Mr Leslie when he addressed the executive. He mentioned the appointment of a publicity agent for wool in England. " I suppose you are paying for personality," he said. "Are you going to forego personality and pay for brains, arid give £ISOO a year for a man who will investigate your troubles in New Zealand? The hard word is here at home." DISJOINTED ACTIVITY

"They say, 'We are doing the work,'" Mr Leslie continued, " but they are not getting the results, partly because there are too many little organisations and partly because of the inexperienced research workers." Mr Leslie criticised the absence of any distinction between practical service to farmers, the application of existing knowledge and the conduct of research where new knowledge had to be established to cope with farmers' problems. "It is very important to have a clear distinction between service and research," he said. "Take the outbreak of disease among sheep in Canterbury this year. To whom did you apply for assistance? Did you apply to the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research? Or was it the Department of Agriculture which was responsible for sending specialists on to your properties? It could not be the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, because it has no veterinary man at all. If you had called in the Department of Agriculture it could not have sent a specialist. It has not got one. It has not a parasitologist; it has only a beginner, who will not be useful for five or six years.

" I cannot see any hope of results till some organisation takes place," Mr Leslie said. "I would not be too keen on the levy on wool till I am assured that you will get satisfactory results. What the wool levy was put on for I do not know,. I am slightly up against it till the Government departments say which of them is going to carry out the research. You will see them watching each other like a cat and a dog all the time. Since we have set up a Department for Scientific and Industrial Research we should say research from that department and service from this. THE REAL TEST

" The real test of research work," the speaker continued, "is the amount of real new stuff that is turned out, not second-hand stuff, and you could write all the new stuff produced here on the back of a class card. It would take 20 volumes to hold all that has been said about what is going to be done. You must ask for a definite ruling on who is doing the research work in this country and who is giving the service, and you must stand out for one department doing the research and one giving the service. " In this country," Mr Leslie continued, " we have a lot of research workers, but they are all beginners and not experienced men. Take the Wheat Research Institute. Not long ago it appointed an expert chemist from Canada. That man has now left to take up a more lucrative position, and they have appointed two juniors. That laboratory is now further back than it was when it started. They started with an expert, and now all the threads arc lost after 10 years." The plant research station had no geneticist, he said. There were men to do this work in the country, but they were separated, being stationed in Auckland, at Palmerston North, and at Lincoln. " The whole thing is disjointed. There are too many little organisations. The Wheat Research Institute should not be separated from the Plant Research Station. It has the only geneticist of experience and standing in the country. There are numerous cases of lack of co-operation." Nothing at all was being done in the country about dairying diseases, Mr Leslie concluded. The department gave the assurance, if it was asked, that something was being done, but there were no results. The result was that the farmers had come to the conclusion that the research work was unsatisfactory. In this they were correct.